UPDATE Antiwar.com to interview Ry from antineocons!

Ry · **Posted:** Wed Jun 25, 2008 6:03 pm

Yay well I'm the 911 nut with the most respect lol what an honor.
I'll be happy to do a show here. I got to agree somewhat with everyone here Scott too. You guys know what I think about 911 and the cover up. But I have to say that what kills 911 truth are 911 "truthers". The people going around pinning everything on illuminati/freemason/space lizards/the Vatican/ Bavarian death cults/rothschilds etc just makes everything sound so stupid and it stains the hard work of actual investigators who stick to the facts. Chances are when someone scoffs at 911 Truth and I mean someone who knows their shit and is not some goose stepping neocons or pawn of the MSM, when someone like Scott or Chomsky, or fill in the blank rolls their eyes it's probably because all they have really heard are the worst kookiest "theories" and 50 videos about building 7 and what amounts to little more than sloganeering as obnoxious (well intentions or not) hecklers get tossed out of crowds. Yelling inside job while satisfying is about like yelling bullshit at a religious function. You might be right but you won't be changing any minds and without the arguments behind it you will just "sound like" a lunatic.

I don't get the same reaction from others that many 911 truthers have. This is because we really dont have the same theory at other than saying what did NOT happen. Scott and I have had some discussions before well on going e-mailings and I know he has mentioned my other work before on the air such as a report on the Russian Oligarchs and a bit I wrote up about the contracts for body armor. He is not close minded or afraid of thinking outside the box on 911.

The problem 911 Truth has is the huge stigma which has been made because of all the people just throwing around buzz words about the "NWO" and come on guys there is some really far out stuff. This kind of disinfo surrounds the JFK and RFK assassination, the OKC bombing, Area 51, etc. Area 51 is a great example. That is now admitted (by the MSM even) to be a secret military base where much of the starwars pork and aerospace pork was spent. But if you write or talk about the billions which were wasted there you won't get but a few sentences into it before people assume you're one of the kooks that believes in anal probing aliens and crop circles. With JFK you got people blaming the mob, the Cubans, the Russian etc.. it takes about three second to know it was not Cuba who would benefit in no way by having LBJ come in. And like building 7, the JFK people focus extensively and lopsidedly on the "magic bullet" where as it is good evidence its not the best and it can be rationalized away. there are much bigger thing like oh JFK's brain "missing" between his transfer to Chicago from Dallas, the film (2008) of a second shooter in the RFK murder etc things that if focused on would simply end the debate.

Its like discussing what flag lapel Obama has on instead of him voting to fund the war.

Anyway to stay on topic Greenwald is right about a very simple point that need to be obvious. The Democrats are sell out they are not the opposition party. Many of you tossed out the notion of the two party paradigm a lont time ago but there are many many people still hung up on that dellusion and to start at step one we have to get more people to realize that.

Also everyone Scott and anti-war.com will and does talk about Israel all the time. MOre so than the largest 911 truth sites with the exception of maybe whatreallyhappened which mostly is my stuff anyway on that topic.

Anti-Neocons

UPDATE Antiwar.com to interview Ry from antineocons!

UPDATE Antiwar.com to interview Ry from antineocons!

UPDATE Antiwar.com to interview Ry from antineocons!

Who is online