 |
 |
Anti-NeoconsRys2sense |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 7 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Revolution
|
Post subject: Obama the Warmonger Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 3:04 am |
|
Joined: Jul 2nd, 2005 Posts: 474
|
Barack Obama: Warmonger
Quote: The Senator from Illinois masquerades as a "peace candidate" - and then proposes the Americans invade Pakistan, the only Muslim nation that has The Bomb. After the U.S. has propped up the military regime for generations, and stunted democracy in a country of 165 million, Obama now thinks he can just walk into western Pakistan - Waziristan - to find and kill Osama bin Ladin. In the process, he would unite all of the Right and the Left opposition to the government in Islamabad, and give the generals no choice but to brandish The Bomb. Obama wants to add 100,000 new troops to the U.S. military. Now we know where they will be going: Waziristan, a place from Hell.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Omega Pi
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 5:09 pm |
|
 |
| Fights PNAC daily |
 |
Joined: Feb 25th, 2007 Posts: 573
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
The_Big_Lebowski
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:19 am |
|
Joined: Sep 8th, 2007 Posts: 1187
|
Obama
appeasing critics, or just covering his ass for what he knows he's going to do later anyways...
Appeaser 08....
perfect...

|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sensi Dave
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:44 am |
|
 |
| Revolutionary Party |
 |
Joined: Jan 29th, 2008 Posts: 444
|
|
Ron Paul was an appeaser too, though not to the extent of Obama. But I was really disgusted by his friendly talk of Israel, his defense of their illegaly bombing Iraq in 1982, his commercial about not allowing visas for 'terrorist' countries, & his vote No for the impeachment of Cheney for lying us into a war that's killed a million people when he voted yes for impeaching Clinton for lying about oral sex. & his defense of the retarded 'official' 9/11 story of course. & his acceptance of votes being blatantly stolen from him when it was even recorded.
In hindsight I think Gravel was the best candidate, even though some of his policies weren't as good. At least he spoke out against Israel & actually pointed out them as the bad guy in that video.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
neoConSlayer
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:12 pm |
|
Joined: Sep 29th, 2007 Posts: 544 Location: USSA
|
while i dont like obama at all this article is difficult to give even a shred of credence. to say osama is known to be "holed up" in pakistan is completely absurd and disingenuous (unless by holed up he means "in a coffin"). considering anyone with even 1/100th of a brain knows osama has been dead for years, even faux news reported he was dead in 2001 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html. on top of that it tries to give credence to the existence of "the toilet" like it is anything more than a mishmash of cia and mossad (and probably other intelligence agencies as well) with a few token patsies to take the fall.
i'll be the first to welcome anything that exposes obama for the zionist warmonger shill that he is, but with plenty of credible articles i'd prefer to leave this article where it belongs (unread)
_________________ “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”. - Ben Franklin
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.” - Thomas Jefferson
If 50 million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing." -Anatole France
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." -Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1758
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." -Galileo
END THE GODDAMN WARS!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Ry
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 7:46 pm |
|
Joined: Jun 27th, 2005 Posts: 31531 Location: Japan
|
Quote: Obama said he would militarily act on Pakistan if all options diplomatically were exhausted. That means working with their leaders whom ever it may be after their elections. Moving in only with an international cooperative post consultation. This article skews his position beyond its original reasoning.
No it means he will attack them if he can find an excuse to. Think about it would you say the same thing about Canada? Do what we say or we will invade if you dont (after the talking fails)? No way. Would we say that to Mexico? NO. Yet Mexico is 14th strongest military in the world and Canada 15 and Pakistan is 20th despite havnig a nuke (which can't even reach the US).
Just why does Pakistan have to comply to anything we say The US has nukes too, invades countries and sends in the CIA to ruin governments all the time. There is no reason to ever attack Pakistan because they are not a threat to the US period.
_________________ This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else. My Twitter "It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman Google version of War by Deception (Magic Bunnies) Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed
ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
The_Big_Lebowski
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:22 pm |
|
Joined: Sep 8th, 2007 Posts: 1187
|
Ry wrote: Quote: Obama said he would militarily act on Pakistan if all options diplomatically were exhausted. That means working with their leaders whom ever it may be after their elections. Moving in only with an international cooperative post consultation. This article skews his position beyond its original reasoning. No it means he will attack them if he can find an excuse to. Think about it would you say the same thing about Canada? Do what we say or we will invade if you dont (after the talking fails)? No way. Would we say that to Mexico? NO. Yet Mexico is 14th strongest military in the world and Canada 15 and Pakistan is 20th despite havnig a nuke (which can't even reach the US). Just why does Pakistan have to comply to anything we say The US has nukes too, invades countries and sends in the CIA to ruin governments all the time. There is no reason to ever attack Pakistan because they are not a threat to the US period.
Exactly...
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 7 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
 |