General Hoke wrote:
Israel was created by the US they are only 60 years old. They were created as a giant cash cow and are the root of corruption. Man Ry that blog had to take forever. I wish our mass media would at least read it.
I think that that can be refined a little, but while agreeing with it. Anyway, and f.e., "Israel was created by the US .... ... as a giant cash cow for the M.I.C., and all while also USING Zionists' psychopathic insanity for achieving this big profit outcome, as well as for cover, because of all of the overtness that the Zionists operate with given that they are protected by their cash cow profiteering U.S.".
Something like that anyway. I add the 'cover, because of overtness ...' part because of how Zionism strongly strikes me. I've been discussing the topic of what party is TOP BOSS with respect to the controllers of the U.S. govt over in a Facebook group. The sole to exchange is Habeas ... (something-or-other), and he claims that Zionists fully control the U.S. govt, the Pentagon, CFR, etc., etc. Habeas names names, Perle, Feith, Wolfowitz, Kissinger, Abrahms, etc., etc.; and they're all involved, but such a list of people is not about what strikes me most of all. I don't disagree that Zionists are definitely "players" in this major league "game", definitely seeking to profit en masse from this, but while not being top boss.
One indication that I employ to arrive at this above perspective is that the Zionists have been making themselves very obvious. How often do we find criminal organizations publicly making the kinds of extremely psychopathic and fully evil statements that the Zionist leadership of Israel (among other Zionist parties) has been doing for years now? VERY RARELY, and it, normally anyway, would only be due to a "slip of the tongue", after which that tongue is carefully monitored and controlled; if not cut out or the body it's attached to terminated.
The BIG OIL AND M.I.C. profiteers have been very silent. We don't hear or read of them coming out and publicly stating psychopathic things. We have not even heard or read of them promoting any of this warring; or, and if they have at all, then I guess it would've been with respect to launching the war on the Taliban, so shortly after 9-11. We did not hear or read of them making psychopathic promotion of the war on Iraq, and we're not getting any with respect to potential war on Iran, while additionally not reading or hearing of them promoting continuation of the war on the Taliban and thereby Central Asia. Nor do we read or hear of them promoting what the instrumental U.S. enforcer is doing in Africa, and elsewhere.
The TOP BOSSES want to avoid public exposure, wanting to stay as unnoticed as possible, of criminal course.
For that, the Zionists overtly provide a lot of distracting cover and can risk doing so, for this is VERY INSTRUMENTAL to the top MOB bosses, who will provide the necessary protection.
There're plenty of people who argue that the Zionists are in charge, and while based on statements from psychopaths like Ben. Netanyahu, among others. That, imo, is all appearance, and the people making these claims or arguments are not looking under the surface and are therefore ignoring the 'much else' that there is underneath or behind this surface.
That's the way that I SEE the situation; all of the profiteering parties being psychopathically criminal, but not all of them being the top bosses, who are surely not going to make themselves wholly obvious. The latter are working at not being obvious at all; just that there's no place for them to hide. They have superpower police state for protecting themselves, but that's also related to not having any place to hide.
Zionism is too clearly of an obviously deliberate overtness; although as insane as such people are, maybe it's not fully deliberate. There [must] be a very considerable degree of deliberation in this, even if not wholly complete, though; I think. Some of the Zionists involved may actually believe that they are working only for Zionist purpose, but this sure does not mean a whole lot in terms of who the really top bosses are. The latter can also believe it to be instrumental to not let all of the Zionist actors know everything, and likely do employ this approach. After all, only those parties really needing to know would be informed of all of the details of the whole operation.
Right? I think so, it's my perspective, but maybe I'm not considering some element(s).
So it's easy to realise that it's believable that the U.S. was responsible for putting the Zionists in to the newly formed state of Israel, establishing all of this; for it most surely was all preventable or avoidable. The Zionists could've surely all been rounded up and canned like tuna, dead or alive. It's not just believable; anything to the contrary would be unbelievable.
And it was surely something do-able by a government that dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. !!
Blaming all of this on Zionists alone strikes me in a way that seems like most of what the following article says would be the fault of Zionists; and it'd be total nonsense to do that, imo. I think the article makes it very clear that it'd be wicked nonsense.
"The Language of Dominion", by Ken. Couesbouc, Aug 13 2007,
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e18174.htm
Lastly, and for readers who haven't read it yet, and wanting some update information on what's going on with respect to the planning with respect to Iraq's OIL, these people may want to have read the following article.
"U.S. and French Oil Conglomerates Share the Spoils of War", SF Chron., Aug 9 2007,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... a&aid=6495
They have some BIG PLANS for Iraqis' oil. A number of U.S. oil corporations are specified, and Sarkozy can't keep his greedy hands away from Iraq's oil, now.
We have the same thing planned for Africa's, Central Asia's or Eurasia's, Canada's, Mexico's, "pretty" much all of the world's oil and other main or very profitable natural resources, so there's no surprise with regards to Iraqis' oil. There are the slight differences in the approaches to obtaining control of these resources, like U.S. warring in Africa being much more covert than in Iraq, and surely not wanting to use any military campaign to capture Ca's and Mexico's resources; but the reasons for varying the approaches are strategically understandable or discernable without much difficulty too.
How could Zionism be top controller of all of this BIG OIL and M.I.C. scheming and profiteering, or gangsterism? I don't and possibly could not see how.
If any of the above strikes you as correctable, then pass on the input, s.v.p. I've gone through all of this for several years now on my own and reading from informative writers, and the above is the perspective arrived at.