Anti-Neocons

How professional is wikipedia? Not very. Check out their page on SONY calling the corporation "a piece of crap." This let anyone edit idea of wiki back fires. I have seen many pages that were in accurate. In the Lavon affair they had the wrong person's name up as the jacket bomber for months. Their profiles on Zionists fair no better. Wiki opperates on the priciple of the squeaky wheel get the oil I believe.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony-See for yourself before they change it.

Be sure to send this to Sony.
I have been showing everyone in Japan.

Feel free to add your own Wiki stories to the thread.

_________________
END THE GOD DAMN WARS
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-dealcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

"If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it or see it.
Would Israel still blame it on Iran?"-Ry Dawson

Google version of War by Deception (Magic Bunnies)
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

lol look at the wiki profile of Marc Rich and it doesn't even metion he was in the Mossad. That's a little important fact they are missing there and it does not get inot his scandals with Gaidar either.

google Marc Rich Mossad and see the top post.

We have to become the media because rioght now we dont have one.

_________________
END THE GOD DAMN WARS
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-dealcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

"If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it or see it.
Would Israel still blame it on Iran?"-Ry Dawson

Google version of War by Deception (Magic Bunnies)
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

That happens all the time. Wikipedia is horrible, not cause of the vandilism, but because of the contsant pro Zionist point of view.

_________________

Politically neutral articles are pretty good on wikipedia, so I've always thought, but when it comes to somewhat lesser known facts that some might not want to be generally known, I think wikipedia is probably way too popular and easily edited to expect to remain uninfluenced.

I've never tried to edit anything there, but maybe there are ways to protect factual articles from within.

yea fuck wiki. i have had alot of bad expieriences with it,

if someone can edit Sony and make it say sony (5th largest media corporation in the world) is a piece of crap and no editor catches then that shows how easily anything can be changed. Dont even report it to them I sent it to WRH I say we nail them and discredit the hell out of the site because they ALWAYS censor things on the side of the Zionists. Try looking up Zionism on Wiki. Funny that they wont even let people edit pages about themselves and yet some turd can write comments like they did about Sony. I have found countless errors on Wiki before and I was shocked to see sites I trusted to link back to them when a) wiki is subject to change and b) it's totally non-factual about anything complicated.

If any one can change the site with apparently little to no oversight within the little clique that runs it, then they can just make "facts" fit with their personal views. As I stated above they had Lavon wrong and with Rich they didn't even mention he was in the Mossad. I see wiki because anytime I look someone up they are one of the top links but when I read them (and I have already read the hostory or rememeber the events as they happened) and I am thinking WTF who wrote this bullshit? I looked on there about the Civil War and all kinds of things were wrong, later they changed slowly but plenty of things on Wiki are plain bull, omitted, or distorted.

_________________
END THE GOD DAMN WARS
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-dealcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

"If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it or see it.
Would Israel still blame it on Iran?"-Ry Dawson

Google version of War by Deception (Magic Bunnies)
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

Ry you've got to chill out man. I'm serious people do that to wikipedia all the time. You'll see everything from racial slurs to just completely random missinformation added to the articles.

Wikipedia has always been bullshit. I remember making a thread here a little while ago complaining about it.

_________________

Well that is what I am talking about. That is all I want to say is how inacurate it is because people dont have to be so obvious with their edititnig. They could easily just chnages some names and dates around. It is particularly important with politics. People need to know that wiki is not an encyclopedia. There is very little fact checking on it and even then people can constanly change things back.

I am sick of people going to wiki to look up Zionism and coming away htinking if you are not a ZIonist then you are an anti-Semite.

_________________
END THE GOD DAMN WARS
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-dealcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

"If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it or see it.
Would Israel still blame it on Iran?"-Ry Dawson

Google version of War by Deception (Magic Bunnies)
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

Yeah that's the problem, wikipedia is like the most "trusted" source of information for casually looking up something for people age 15-25. Faux news for the younger crowd.

_________________

its not there anymore.

_________________

"Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of ... [Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness], it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government." –Thomas Jefferson

whos that?

_________________
On the outside wall are the three slogans of the Party: "War is Peace," "Freedom is Slavery," "Ignorance is Strength." - The Ministry of Truth, 1984.

rumor on the street is he's one of dem derr anti bush leebrals or some sort

_________________
On the outside wall are the three slogans of the Party: "War is Peace," "Freedom is Slavery," "Ignorance is Strength." - The Ministry of Truth, 1984.

this was on wikipedia a while back



look above the map on the right: it reads

nice observations ry. damn. i'm gonna stop quoting the wiki then.

I agree with IrrigatedPancake though, with non-political subjects the wiki can provide a decent base of info for something.

But i've also witnessed the misinfo and sabotage, which ultimately makes it an unreliable source.

I signed up and made an account there but haven't edited anything yet because it bugs me out and i couldn't figure out how.

_________________

There are two major classes of editors who affect what gets in a Wikipedia article. Those who are Republican and those who are Pro Israel. Wikipedia articles are actually really good if they dont touch on those subjects.
Each is represented by only 2 or 3 very active editors who often are elected admins as well (ironically an editor who stood for election a while back had "I am a democrat" on his user page and lost, that claim indicating he was partisan was given as the reason why for several no votes lmao). The worst of these are one called MONGO who supports all things pro U.S./Republican and Jayjg who supports all things Israel. Ironically they are both excellent editors on subjects outside their particular bias.

These handfull of editors do most of the argueing to remove anything negative against the neocons or Israel or remove anything too positive on subjects they dont like. If they look like losing a consensus, suddenly dozens of editors who never visited the page before turn up to side with them. It is extremely rare for them to lose and therefore have disputed material left on a page.

That is a major problem with Wikipedia. A small group of very biased editors have too much power because they are organised enough to call on support to get what they want. It is against policy to message people to support you and it can get you banned but it is ok if you use a messenger instead. To do that though you have to have a lot of editors on your list which requires committment to control content which unbiased editors don't have because of the fact that they have no bias and thus no agenda.

It's just un-academic, subject to no reprisals for printing disinformation, constantly changing, consistently wrong, virtually anonymous, and obviously politically bias.

However they fly to the top of google. The problem is that uninformed people will not recognized all the mistakes and will not be aware of the lack of credibility and easy corruption. The word sounds like encyclopedia and it pretends to write like one, so because of that people are trusting it a lot more than they should.

_________________
END THE GOD DAMN WARS
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-dealcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

"If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it or see it.
Would Israel still blame it on Iran?"-Ry Dawson

Google version of War by Deception (Magic Bunnies)
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

Wiki can be very dangerous. Alot of people assume everything on there in unbiased, but that page is as biased as biased gets on controversial issues.

Seriously, sometimes i feel like giving up, these people own the mainstream media and now there luring internet users to their bullshit.

_________________

Wiki screws up again

So I decided to look up the Island from which I was born.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croatoan_Island

Wiki has the wrong island. They place Croatoan NEAR Hatteras Island (they also claim it is an island) when in fact Croatoan IS on Hatteras Island. Here is a map.


See that Croatoan is Hatteras Island. Manteo or Roanoke -(old name)

In fact the Native American Manteo for which that island in named after was born on Hatteras Island. He went to England with Sir Walter Raleigh whom the capital of the state is named after. Native Americans were named several different ways, after their cities (like saying Perisians) after their own names (what they called themselves) or after what they were called by a near by tribe that spoke a different language (like the Dine being called Navajo). Croatoan was the town, Hatterask were the Native people however Croatoaners (to anglofy it) would also be Hatterask "Indians.' And the Island named after the people there is Cape Hatteras. The new town now sitting on Croatoan is Buxton. -ton being English of course. North of Buxton was Kinnakeet now changed to Avon and South of Buxton was Trent now called Frisco. (Kinnakeets were also a band) family-band-clan-tribe-nation that's the order.

This is very well documented stuff here but apparently Wiki can't tell its ass from its elbow again.

Maybe they should let me edit it. ha ha no way. I would not do it either the site is crap and beyond repair. I looked up only 6 things in the past two days and 3 had huge mistakes.

_________________
END THE GOD DAMN WARS
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-dealcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

"If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it or see it.
Would Israel still blame it on Iran?"-Ry Dawson

Google version of War by Deception (Magic Bunnies)
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

Wikipedia may not be perfect, which only means that more editing and better supervision is necessary and of course, it's okay to criticize that.

But then at least make sure that your own words don't look ridiculous, because the first poster, Ry, has to get his English right, before he complains about others:

Backfires is ONE WORD, it's not back fires.
Inaccurate is again ONE WORD and not in accurate.

So how accurate is Ry? It's okay to laugh, people! I think, it just backfired (or back fired, Ry?) on you...

ya know, I AM a door-to-door encyclopedia salesman, if anyone's interested

_________________
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
Sir Winston Churchill

"Fine, let’s take a vote. Who wants fish for dinner?...Yeah, democracy ain’t so fun when it fucks you, huh?” http://twitter.com/Shitmydadsays

hey there slick, I am not and do not claim to be an encyclopedia. You have one post and we know you're from wiki you would have had to scour over the first post to look for a mistake just to write about it. I always make mistakes, I dont have any editors unlike wiki, and I live in Japan ps. Saying back fire instead of backfire (whuppy do) is not the same as and is no where near as bad as objectively writing about a company and saying "so and so company is a piece of crap" or omitting that a famous criminal was in the Mossad or Writing the wrong person's name as a bomber in a well know historical event where google links right under it go to books written on the same thing which have the correct people's names and it is not just politics it is also geography wiki was putting a place on the wrong fucking island and then inventing a new island that does not even exist and placing it there. And it does not make me look ridiculous to say backfire instead of back fire, it just makes you look anal retentive.

No one is laughing at my typo no one cares but you. How accurate is Ry? Well Ry is right in the content of what he posted which was showing how lame wiki is and how full of disinformation it is. And how little maturity it has.

I am just going to keep looking things up on wiki now and I will keep posting them here. I find mistakes in almost everything I look up.

Ry was accurate about the whole Libby affair, the Iraq War, the WMD claims, the AIPAC scandal, the Hariri murder, Litiveneko etc. You can stick it.

_________________
END THE GOD DAMN WARS
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-dealcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

"If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it or see it.
Would Israel still blame it on Iran?"-Ry Dawson

Google version of War by Deception (Magic Bunnies)
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

haha

yeah shut up bochkor, bitch please.

Isn't "I Rack" two words?

hahaha

_________________
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
Sir Winston Churchill

"Fine, let’s take a vote. Who wants fish for dinner?...Yeah, democracy ain’t so fun when it fucks you, huh?” http://twitter.com/Shitmydadsays

thank god ry addressed bochkor cause i was about to fly off the handle. man, i read that and i was like ooooh some noob just fired shots!

wow.

listen bochkor, i've been around here enough to know that is goes like this:

ry types a post

hits submit

then moves on to the next task.

he doesn't sit around being anal like me, editing his post to fix typos. he doesn't bother with trivial crap. yes this makes some academics and scolars think he's stupid but if all you care about is proper grammar over REAL information then i wonder who the real fool is. the one with the grammar problem or the one with the stereotyping problem. his info is solid and his comments here about the wiki are legit.

seriously. i'll stand beside adam on this one. good response ry. bochkor, climb down off your self-adorned pedastle honey. you're amongst fearless strength here.

_________________

Somebody ban this jerk-off.


kontent iz wutz emportint, KNOT speling

_________________