Anti-Neocons

I keep getting a variety of sources, some saying that a plane definitly hit it, and then the ones who say missile etc.. I mean what's going on? I'm fairly convinced after watching loose change that it was a missile.

_________________

_________________
''the infant is not bold without divine aid''

IMHO I think a plane really hit it, and the missle theory was "planted" to make conspiracy nuts out of all the people who have legitimate questions of what happened on 9-11.

Beware of Loose Change, there's a lot of disinfo in there.

That said, I'm not sure what hit the pentagon. Using the plane (possibly along with explosives like they did at the WTC) would be logical, after all they'd have to disappear the plane somehow if they used anything else, and why not dispose of it the way they need, and generate eyewitnesses at the same time?

On the other hand, the damage to the building does look more like missile damage, I'd think a plane hitting would at least have left scratches where the wings hit.

The problem with the "no plane" theory is that IF it was planted, it can be easily refuted when the govt sees fit (there are hundreds of surveillance cameras in the area that must have some coverage of the impact!), and that could discredit the entire 9/11 truth movement. It's possible that they're just waiting for the "no plane" theory to be widely accepted (e.g. after Fahrenheit 9/11, part 2 will focus on the pentagon damage) to release hundreds of videos clearly showing the plane.
On the other hand, if nobody buys the "no plane" theory and the pentagon was indeed hit by a missile and not by a plane, nothing relevant is lost -- without the stand-down, neither a plane nor a missile could have come even close to hitting the pentagon, and of course the explosives in the WTC are all the proof we need without even looking at the pentagon.

Before I knew about 9/11 truth I always thought the pentagon must have been hit my a missle. Its makes sense, relatively speaking, for the government to shoot down a highjaked plane, then hit the pentagon with a missle to spin and save morale.

The part that got hit was not only under rennovation, but the people that died had only been working there for a few weeks and nobody knew who they were, or what they were doing. That comes from inside the Pentagon.

The Pentagon, the most secure building in the USA, has its own defense system and 100s of cameras and the only shots theyve released are those 6 grainy photoshop jobs. The only camera facing that direction not owned by the feds was at a nearby gas station, and was confiscated by the SS that afternoon. This is all documented in the film
"In Plane Sight"

To manuver a passenger plane into a 5 story building without a single eye whitness would be difficult, but not impossible. But look at the neat little hole in the pentagon exterior. No holes where the 10X11X9 foot engines would be. Not a trace of any part of a plane, besides one neat little section of windows as seen in "debunking 9/11 myths" Not a single piece of either of the twin Rolls engines. First respondents said they saw no wreckage.

_________________
"History is the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon."

yeah it would be hard to maneuver a plane into the pentagon without an eye witness.

That is why there are eye witnesses.

Here are a few:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911_p ... esses.html


Can't wait to have a long drawn on thread on this retarded topic again. Nothing like wasting your time on the mechanics of how someone was murdered while the murderer runs loose.

_________________
Is your view of the world in sync with what you 'know' about the world?

"The state breaks everything and then blames freedom.
The state destroys everything and then blames those who interact voluntarily for that destruction."
-- Stefan Molyneux

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWXJng7MhR8