Anti-Neocons

Lol.

Welcome to CNN September 12th 2001.

just kidding.

So you think the hijackers would attack targets that would knowingly have almost no effect on the country whatsoever?

Countries are not buildings. The problem with this country is not its buildings. Do you think someone smart enough to plan this would not understand this? Especially someone as connected as a billionaire family member like Osama Bin Laden?

If someone wanted to damage this country as much as possible they wouldn't be attacking buildings. They'd be attacking resources like energy, water, and oil. All very capable of disruption without suicide even being involved.

So you believe the government official story on 911 but not the government official stories on Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

If you don't believe the Iraq and SA stories, why believe the Osama Bin Laden stories? Other than the evidence that OBL was a CIA creature and is very obviously a family member of the Saudi Binladin Group who are closely tied to the Bush family and in bed with Carlyle among others.

How much obvious conflict with the government official version does it take before you realize you were also lied to about 911?

_________________
Is your view of the world in sync with what you 'know' about the world?

"The state breaks everything and then blames freedom.
The state destroys everything and then blames those who interact voluntarily for that destruction."
-- Stefan Molyneux

Bin Laden=Goldstein

chill out Brian

But you really think that this was planned by Arabs? Why on earth would they give the US an excuse to bomb Afghanistan and Iraq?

Do you endorse the 19 Arab hijackers theory, as part of a plot hatched by "al-qaeda"?

I think they chose the towers because they were going to be knocked down(or renovated) which would had cost them more than what it caused them to knock down.

_________________
"Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of ... [Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness], it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government." –Thomas Jefferson

For any who doubt this theory, I have previously posted how Disney abated and rennovated both the Contemporary and Polynesian hotels at a cost greater than demolishing and rebuilding them. So yes, this is possible, but probably not a major motivation.

NO the targets were because they were covering up about 2 trillon dollars stoen by the DOD and Banks. The reason the Naval section was erased in the Pentagon is because that is where the Israeli Spies had made a nest.

It terrorist wanted to fuck up America they could have dove into a nuclear power plant. They flew right over one in NY twice. They also could have followed up. look at what the DC snipers did all by themselves. Imagine 19 of those. Now imagine 100.

_________________
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

Google version of War by Deception
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

Brian Foley wrote:

You are wrong. Resistance fighters attack strategical targets. Emotional symbolism is for the tyrants.


Brian Foley wrote:

Maybe what you wrote makes sense to you, but I have no idea how your responses makes any sense with what I wrote.


Brian Foley wrote:

Again, you are getting your resistance groups and false flags outfits mixed up. The IRA is also a wonderful tool for blaming false flags.


Brian Foley wrote:

Again, maybe this makes sense to you, but I don't see why you said this. Maybe you are just really bad at communicating.


Brian Foley wrote:

So you think the hijackers were masterminded by someone other than Osama Bin Laden? Interesting. You are taking a bad official government explanation and just writing your own fiction into it? Neat.

Brian Foley wrote:

The part where you are supporting that airplanes alone took down the buildings. If you realized they were demolished you wouldn't have said the remark about something a lot bigger than a 747 to take out Hoover dam. Because if the WTC was blown up, what the hell does that have to do with the size of a plane? It takes something a hell of a lot larger than a 747 to make a building collapse due to failure and appear just like a controlled demolition.

So basically everything you wrote is support for the official theory.

_________________
Is your view of the world in sync with what you 'know' about the world?

"The state breaks everything and then blames freedom.
The state destroys everything and then blames those who interact voluntarily for that destruction."
-- Stefan Molyneux