Anti-Neocons

That more than jet fuel was involved in heating the site.
Jet fuel burning at maximum efficiency doesn't get hot enough to melt steel. I don't know of anything else that would have been in the towers that could have just happen to have provided sufficient fuel to melt steel either.

Take the Madrid fire. Did you happen to see that building burned to it's shell? Yet the steel didn't melt.

Did the WTC look anything like the madrid fire before it was demoli--- i mean, before it catastrophically collapsed (lol)?

_________________
Is your view of the world in sync with what you 'know' about the world?

"The state breaks everything and then blames freedom.
The state destroys everything and then blames those who interact voluntarily for that destruction."
-- Stefan Molyneux

Alright thanx. I guess i would be crossing the line by speculating that thermate bombs or something of that sort were the reasons the towers fell, but use of thermate in the collapse is backed by evidence.

I know about the madrid fire, i'll be sure to bring it up if i need to.

and that guy on that forum is the master of strawmen arguments.

_________________

He's worse than that. He's trying to win. I don't think he cares at all about the truth.

Too bad that winning when it means spreading lies = losing for everyone.

_________________
Is your view of the world in sync with what you 'know' about the world?

"The state breaks everything and then blames freedom.
The state destroys everything and then blames those who interact voluntarily for that destruction."
-- Stefan Molyneux

Also, there are hella great pics of the madrid tower breaking off in chunks, but not collapsing. Post pics from different phases as well.

_________________
To be the tree that will not bend when the winds of change are blowing, is to be the tree that will be broken in the strongest winds of unknowing.

-saint