There was no plan to kill Jews. NEVER. Not from Hitler. Not from Himmler. Not anyone. That alleged tape with Himmler having a secret meeting telling other nazis to keep the extermination plan secret is a forgery.
"Speer knew Holocaust plan"/ Posen speechhttp://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4286
HIMMLER'S SO CALLED EXTERMINATION OF THE JEWS SPEECHhttp://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=5474
I'm sure you've all seen Mike wallace trying to trap Ernst Zundel on television with this Himmler speech crap before.
Ernst Zundel caught lying again http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNRGhIowG9g
Here's what you didn't know about that video. They tried to trap Zundel and make him look bad but he said I will only interview you if you allow ME to bring along a recorder and tape this WHOLE INTERVIEW for my personal records. At first they refused. Why? Because they didn't want him to be able to save his image one day if he had to. Eventually they relented because Zundel was going to go public about how a supposedly bulletproof theory of history and perfect journalists APPARENTLY were afraid to let an alleged lunatic document his own lunacy. Which makes little sense of course. And yet that's what happened. So clearly they were scared of Zundel. Now in Michael Hoffman's book THE GREAT HOLOCAUST TRIAL, he talks about this a little.
In seeking to ingratiate himself with the higher ups, Mike Wallace cut a deal with the Anti Defamation League to definitively smear revisionists on Sixty Minutes. The ADL admitted that: "The League worked closely with the staff of CBS's Sixty Minutes in the preparation of a recent segment exposing the fallacies of holocaust denial."
Out of a one hundred minute conversation with Mike Wallace, and jewish producer Barry Landau (who was firing question prompts to Wallace off camera), Sixty Minutes chose to use four minutes of Zundel's remarks, mostly centered around Himmler's Posen speech. Wallace led Zundel to believe he was making a reference to intercepted radio transcripts of the speech but immediatly after Ernst made a comment about Posen the camera cut to a scene of original German documents in a Washington archives, as if to show that Zundel didn't know what he was talking about.
It was indeed a hatchet job but Zundel did preserve a single ace up his well worn sleeve. Before agreeing to be interviewed he insisted, as a prerequisite of his appearance that he be allowed to have the complete interview taped by a friend who possessed professional audio equipment. In desperation Sixty Minutes agreed.
It is a most edifying and entertaining one hundred minutes. Zundel - though always courteous - competely dominates Mike Wallace. He reels off dates, he invokes personalities, he cites reports and when Wallace is particularly scornful or sneering, he jokes with a killer wit which disarms the sanctimony in which acolytes of the holy hoax, attire their glittering generalities and asinine axioms.
If any extended segment of that interview had been broadcast on Sixty Minutes, Zundel would have made thousands of new allies on the spot. As it was, in the four minutes allotted to him he managed to convey an image of a gentleman and a stalwartly defiant revisionist. So in spite of Barry Landau and the ADL, Zundel made some new friends anyway.
As for the aktion reinhard camps if any extermination happened, it would have been in those camps. We already know all the lies about Auschwitz, Dacuau, etc that have been exposed. But the evidence is lacking there. GPR work at Treblinka and alleged core samples taken at Belzec that have never been proven by Kola to scientifically contain the human remains he claims are there don't prove the holocaust. Proper excavations will but Jews always step in the way of that and complain about disturbing the remains of the dead. Problem is, Jews make excuses for digging up Jews all the time so this complaint seems almost like a protection racket.viewtopic.php?p=175685#p175685
As for David Irving himself, I have gone into him on detail with the help of exposures of other authors. The guy is a pedophile, a pervert and a poor historian. Hell he even claims the Goebbels diaries are authentic when there is absolutely no proof they are. Well okay, some may have been written by Goebbels, but the most damning passages which allegedly point to a homicidal 'final solution' are VERY QUESTIONABLE.
The Goebbels diary: a forgery?http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=3793
Do your homework on Irving. viewtopic.php?p=171501#p171501