Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ

Board index » Archives by areas of the world » Archived topics here » Iraq




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Where the Iraqi oil is going
 Post Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 5:27 pm 
Offline
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
User avatar

Joined: Jul 22nd, 2005
Posts: 10
I got this from Nurhassan's blog on myspace.


U.S. checking possibility of pumping oil from northern Iraq to Haifa, via Jordan

By Amiram Cohen

The United States has asked Israel to check the possibility of pumping oil from Iraq to the oil refineries in Haifa. The request came in a telegram last week from a senior
Pentagon official to a top Foreign Ministry official in Jerusalem.

The Prime Minister's Office, which views the pipeline to Haifa as a "bonus" the U.S. could give to Israel in return for its unequivocal support for the American-led campaign in Iraq, had asked the Americans for the official telegram.

The new pipeline would take oil from the Kirkuk area, where some 40 percent of Iraqi oil is produced, and transport it via Mosul, and then across Jordan to Israel. The U.S. telegram included a request for a cost estimate for repairing the Mosul-Haifa pipeline that was in use prior to 1948. During the War of Independence, the Iraqis stopped the flow of oil to Haifa and the pipeline fell into disrepair over the years.

The National Infrastructure Ministry has recently conducted research indicating that construction of a 42-inch diameter pipeline between Kirkuk and Haifa would cost about $400, 000 per kilometer. The old Mosul-Haifa pipeline was only 8 inches in diameter.

National Infrastructure Minister Yosef Paritzky said yesterday that the port of Haifa is an attractive destination for Iraqi oil and that he plans to discuss this matter with the U.S. secretary of energy during his planned visit to Washington next month. Paritzky added that the plan depends on Jordan's consent and that Jordan would receive a transit fee for allowing the oil to piped through its territory. The minister noted, however, that "due to pan-Arab concerns, it will be hard for the Jordanians to agree to the flow of Iraqi oil via Jordan and Israel."

Sources in Jerusalem confirmed yesterday that the Americans are looking into the possibility of laying a new pipeline via Jordan and Israel. (There is also a pipeline running via Syria that has not been used in some three decades.)

Iraqi oil is now being transported via Turkey to a small Mediterranean port near the Syrian border. The transit fee collected by Turkey is an important source of revenue for the country. This line has been damaged by sabotage twice in recent weeks and is presently out of service.

In response to rumors about the possible Kirkuk-Mosul-Haifa pipeline, Turkey has warned Israel that it would regard this development as a serious blow to Turkish-Israeli relations.

Sources in Jerusalem suggest that the American hints about the alternative pipeline are part of an attempt to apply pressure on Turkey.

Iraq is one of the world's largest oil producers, with the potential of reaching about 2.5 million barrels a day. Oil exports were halted after the Gulf War in 1991 and then were allowed again on a limited basis (1.5 million barrels per day) to finance the import of food and medicines. Iraq is currently exporting several hundred thousand barrels of oil per day.

During his visit to Washington in about two weeks, Paritzky also plans to discuss the possibility of U.S. and international assistance for joint Israeli-Palestinian projects in the areas of energy and infrastructure, natural gas, desalination and electricity.

So far the US invasion of Iraq has brought many political and strategic advantages for Israel in shape of revival of Israeli intelligence and Media network in Iraq. Israeli secret service Mossad has largely expanded its network in Northern Iraq particularly in Kurd areas where presence of its agents has multiplied over ten times. According to reports Mossad has established offices in several key cities like Irbel and Sulemaniah. Besides, the Israeli think tank MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute) has recently established its offices in Iraq. According to reports MEMRI primarily intends to monitor Iraqi media reports and translate them into Hebrew for policy concerns of Tel Aviv. But its aims are believed to be much beyond what was stated since its management has kept the location of its new offices in Iraq a secret for ‘security reasons’.

As for huge economic prospects in Iraq, Israel has succeeded in earning several contracts for its firms in Iraqi “rebuilding”. But the largest profit prospects Israel is eyeing in Iraq are associated with the revival of an oil pipeline that connected the oil reserves in Northern Iraq to Israeli port-city of Haifa via Jordan. This pipeline has remained closed since 1948 after Jewish occupation of Palestinian lands.
Washington is co-sponsoring the pipeline revival plan with Israel as some of the leading US oil companies are collaborating with Israeli counterparts in the project. Feasibilities of the project have been completed and work has already been started to the dismay of Turkey which has expressed serious concerns on the plan that tends to damage considerably its economic interests.

Turkey has been the sole beneficiary after the Mosul-Haifa pipeline was closed 56 years ago. Ankara had succeeded in laying a major pipeline to Mosul that allows it to pump huge quantities of oil which it has been supplying to most of the European countries. But in case of revival of pipeline to Haifa the major oil share would flow into it significantly reducing Ankara’s share and damaging its economic interests. Turkey has been working on a plan to combine its oil pipeline to Mosal and the gas pipeline from Central Asian states and connecting both of them to its port city of Gihan but this US-Israeli plan has devastated those prospects.
According to estimates, Israel will become one of the leading oil suppliers of the region after commissioning of the Haifa pipeline, and realization of those huge economic prospects depended upon the stay of US forces in Iraq.


If you would like to do more research on the pipeline and see pictures of it:

http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/ ... 31019.html
[/i]


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:56 pm 
Offline
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
User avatar

Joined: Jul 22nd, 2005
Posts: 10
Ever since I found out there was an old pipeline from Iraq to Haiffa, I knew the U.S. was going to somehow revive it to appease the Israelis. It really angers me to know that Israel is becoming more and more powerful and in a sense immortal in the Middle East. I guess Israel has followed in the footsteps of Halliburton by purchasing the "rebuilding" contracts. There are Mossad agents are all over Northern Iraq...its really a shame whats become of Iraq, and its future. Makes you think if the war in Iraq was mainly a war for Israel, or if the Zionists still believe that the Israeli borders are rightfully from the Nile to the Euphrates. ::SIGH!!::


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:50 pm 
Offline
Speaking out
Speaking out
User avatar

Joined: Jun 29th, 2005
Posts: 187
Location: North Carolina, The 'borro
Whatever the goal of a war in Iraq, one thing is for sure...it's not working out, whether it be for the safety of Israel, access to Iraqi oil, corporate interests, to spread "freedom and democracy", "fight terrorism", stop WMD proliferation, establish military bases for a war on Iran, or just flex our military muscle and assert American Military Dominance.

The New Iraqi government is developing closer ties with Iran than any other Middle Eastern nation; can’t be good for Israel.
The cost of the war in Iraq is reaching a level that outweighs any profit that could be made thru access to Iraqi oil (at least in the short term).
The Corporate sectors seems to be doing alright, overcharging for services and capitalizing on death and destruction (hooray).
Democracy? Maybe, Freedom? Not so much. The Iraqi government looks like it is going to drafting a constitution based on Sharia, the Iraqi government’s interpretation of Sharia will mean leaving Iraqi women (in particular) with less rights then they had under Saddam’s Sunni government
War on Terror? Well if killing truckloads of Iraqi families at check points is your idea of fighting terror; then I guess we’re putting a smack down on those “terrorist bastards”
No WMDs here, but it turns out IEDs are a lot cheaper and more effective at killing Americans
Permanent Bases=Never-ending insurgency

What's the likelyhood Jordan (or Syria) would actually allow a pipeline through their territory? I would imagine they would want mucho royalties off of it.

_________________
Image
"XBOX is pretty cool tho..."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 1:13 am 
 
Syria is definetely out of the question for a pipeline, Jordan is the only possibilty. The Jordanian monarchy dont do as they please, they are puppets to the American government. They will do as theyre told. The pipeline to Haifa, Israel would serve U.S. interests better than the port in Turkey.

As for profits and success of the Iraq war, I think you are looking at it in present and short terms. In the long run the U.S. will have complete dominance on the regions oil wealth, whether it is directly through occupation or the looming economical presence that is permanently going to be ingraned in the region one way or another.


Top 
  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 1:15 am 
Offline
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
User avatar

Joined: Jul 22nd, 2005
Posts: 10
The above post was me btw. I forgot to log in.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:57 am 
Offline
Speaking out
Speaking out
User avatar

Joined: Jun 29th, 2005
Posts: 187
Location: North Carolina, The 'borro
This is a section of a Transcript from Democracy Now! August 3rd

Quote:
* General George Casey,
"I do believe that if the political process continues to go positively, and if the development of the security forces continues to go as it is going, I believe we'll be able to take substantial reductions after the elections in the spring and summer next year."


General Casey made his comments standing next to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. This was the latest and perhaps most significant statement to come after weeks of buzz about a possible US exit plan. But the way it is being spun by the Pentagon is that the withdrawal will come as the Iraqi army, police and other so-called security forces assume more control of the security of the country. That's far from happening. In fact, these are among the most dangerous jobs in Iraq with resistance fighters killing soldiers and police every day. And the security forces in the new Iraq are responsible for widespread human rights abuses and extrajudicial killings.

Take the recent examples of groups of Sunni men arrested by Iraqi forces only to turn up dead. Many Sunnis now assume that being arrested is the equivalent of being killed. Far from moving toward greater stability and calm, Iraq is continuing to get more and more bloody and chaotic. Some analysts believe that the recent US talk of pullout is happening because the US is losing militarily in Iraq to multiple enemies, loosely called the insurgents or the resistance.

Our guest today writes that civil war has already begun in Iraq. He has the center spread in the current issue of the paper called, "Bush’s Exit Plan: Civil War." He says, "With the war stalemated, repeated deployments wearing down morale of U.S. troops and too few new recruits to maintain force levels, the Bush administration may be deliberately provoking civil war as its “exit strategy.” The goal is not so much to exit Iraq, but leave behind a skeletal military force that would maintain the network of permanent bases under construction throughout Iraq while maintaining access to massive oil deposits in the North and South. Breaking Iraq into a series of mini-states, a strategy being pushed by some White House allies in the media, is seen as one way to ensure these goals."


(if this is true) looks like they are thinking long term. What an exit strategy...bravo Mr. Bush

_________________
Image
"XBOX is pretty cool tho..."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:17 pm 
Offline
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
User avatar

Joined: Jun 27th, 2005
Posts: 31510
Location: Japan
PNAC stated back in the 90s the goal for Greater Israel. This is why the plame affair with Rove is so important. It connects the dots back to AIPAC and Libby and the rest of the OSP.

"Here's the situation. Israel wants to control the US in order to send the US military out to kill Israel's enemies. But Saudi Arabia pours billions of dollars INTO the US economy every year while Israel takes billions OUT. The influence that Saudi Arabia's billions buys within the US is a threat to Israel's control, and as AIPAC, ADL, and other pro-Israel organizations continue to be exposed as spy operations, the US Congress is starting to move away from overt support of Israel.

Right now, anything that sabotages US/Saudi relations is a benefit to Israel, and as the Lavon Affair proved, Israel will not hesitate to use false-flag terror attacks to carry out such sabotage. " -WRH


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

Board index » Archives by areas of the world » Archived topics here » Iraq


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: