Anti-Neocons

Linton is the guy who unambiguously declared that he was "certain" that Brendon O'Connell = "Fester" = Daryl Bradford Smith.



Linton's "certainty" was reduced by 20% soon thereafter:



Then lo and behold, four years later, Linton finally plucked-up the courage to admit that he was 100% wrong about his Brendon O'Connell = "Fester" = Daryl Bradford Smith theory. This is something to keep firmly in mind whenever you hear Linton announce that he's "certain" of something. This is also something to keep firmly in mind whenever you see Linton and "Poseidon" trying to score propaganda points by continually dredging-up my past mistakes.



Although Linton falsely states that his absurd claim was "promptly binned", it is only in recent weeks that he's had the balls to admit that he got it all wrong. Given that Linton doesn't like any challenges that I put his way, and being a yellow-bellied coward, he is guaranteed to avoid this fresh challenge that I'm about to put to him. Linton has unambiguously stated that his absurd claim of Brendon O'Connell being "Fester" and Daryl Bradford Smith was "promptly binned" about a week after it had first been made. If this was the case, Linton should therefore be able to show us where and when he made a statement wherein he retracted this absurd claim. This he will not be able to do for the simple reason that he is lying. His absurd claim was not "promptly binned", as he falsely states. This absurd claim was first made in May 2007 and was not retracted until March 2011. Since Linton has stated that his absurd claim of Brendon O'Connell and Daryl Bradford Smith being one and the same person was "promptly binned", the onus lies with him to furbish evidence to this effect. This he will not be able to do because he has lied. Rather than just put his hand up and admit his mistake, Linton tries to lie his way out of the corner he has painted himself into, This he has done to save face. Linton knows full-well that he cannot score propaganda points from my past mistaken identity errors when he himself is also guilty of having made the exact the same mistake. Although Linton knows he is playing a zero-game here, he is for far up his own arse and off his head on drugs that he believes he can actually win a zero-sum game. Numpty.

Furthermore, Linton has tried to play-down his mistake by claiming that his absurd claim of Brendon O'Connell being "Fester" and Daryl Bradford Smith "had arisen out of speculation that lasted not more than a week". But this is demonstrably false. When Linton first made his absurd claim, he did not state at the time that he was "speculating". On the contrary, he stated unambiguously that he was "certain" that Brendon O'Connell and Daryl Bradford Smith were one and the same person. Few if any, will be deceived or impressed by Linton's futile and quite pathetic attempt to dig himself out of a hole that he himself has dug. There is a huge difference between speculating about someone's identity and stating that you are "certain" of someone's identity.



And I was pointing-out that your posting-partner has posted a ton of disinformation about myself. But you don't address this. I'd be very surprised indeed if I was to discover that you actually believed these false claims. But I understand your precarious position. So closely involved are you with "Poseidon", that you have no other choice but to go along his false claims. But credit where credit is due. You have at least been wise enough not to parrot these false claims. But the brownie points you score here are immediately cancelled by you being foolish enough to accept the lies that your friend Makeham has told. A big, big mistake Linton. You should never have got yourself involved with Dan Makeham.



So, you agree with your pal "Poseidon" then? Do you seriously believe that "Poseidon" is correct when he accuses Drew J of being a "Jewish disinformation agent", or are you just trying to cover your butt-buddy's arse, but falling flat on your face in the process?



"Deliberate disinformation", claims Linton. I'll show you what deliberate disinformation looks like, you prick.





Drew is a lot smarter than you perceive him to be, you condescending, smug, arrogant prick. He was quick to get wise to you and "Poseidon".



As the reader pours through my response, they'll soon discover who the real bullshit artist is.





I think the reader will find that "Poseidon" has been pointing the finger and accusing people of being "Zionist agents" longer than I have, and I think the reader will find that "Poseidon" has labeled more people as "Zionist agents", "shills" and "disinformation artists" than I ever have.







The organ-grinder has tried the same trick in the past and got his arse booted. Now it's the turn of his monkey.

There are plenty of people I disagree with, who I either know or believe not be shills and/or disinformationalists. My friend Andy, "Quasimodo" to you, believes that the twin towers to not have been hit by aircraft. I do not share Andy's belief. But I know that Andy is not a "shill", a "disinformationalist", or a "Zionist agent", as your pal "Poseidon has falsely alleged on multiple occasions despite having priorly concluded that there isn't any evidence of Andy being a "Zionist agent".

And I have had disagreements with my dear old mum, who believes that six-million Jews were "holocausted" by the Nazis, and that Arabs did 9-11. But I can state with more than 80% certainty that my mum isn't a shill.

Nice try Linton, but your pathetic defence of "Poseidon" just went pear-shaped. The illogical "argument" you have presented is patently fallacious. No banana for the chimp, no corn for the chicken.





Oh yes....whatever Mr know-it-all "Poseidon", that fount of infinite knowledge and wisdom, says or "decides" is the absolute finality. There will be no further discussion. While Judge Steve "Poseidon" might have "decided" that Linton and Pedersen are "genuine", myself and others have long decided that they most certainly are not. Judge S. "Poseidon" also decided that Linton and his "kosher" friend, that "innocent little girl" who gave ecstasy pills for free to schoolkids for free, were "normal people".



But even Linton himself can see that he is actually abnormal. Someone who publicly states that they are capable of raping your family can't be anything other than abnormal in the extreme.





Ah! Suzette the Whippette, the retard of Oxnard!





I wondered how long it would be before the "Suzette" card was played again! So, let's deconstruct what Linton has just said here. Suzette Bates posted the following message on wakeupfromyourslumber on 7th July 2007:



I thought it odd that Bates would post such a message publicly. She knew Linton's e-mail address and could just as easily have contacted him by e-mail instead. Although Linton states Bates to be my "friend", I was, however, trying to get rid of her at the time she initiated contact with Linton via WUFYS and had been for quite a while beforehand. I inherited Bates via Michael Stewart, it was him who introduced her to me. I didn't trust her then and I trust her even less now. My association with Suzette Bates began in the early part of 2007. It ended in July of that year. I felt relieved of a burden when it did.

Linton states that Bates was "immediately" identified by me as "being part of a "team" of "shills"". Note his usage of the word "immediate". Linton will also use this particular word again later, the significance of which you will then see. It was earlier shown that Bates initiated contact with Linton on 7th July 2007. That was the first I knew of her having been in contact with Linton. It was ten days later before "Poseidon" announced that he, Bates and Linton were working as a team alongside Nina Pedersen.



So even if I had decided on 17th July 2007 that Bates was "part of a team of shills", a ten-day delay could hardly be considered an "immediate" response. But in any event, I don't recall having contacted Bates after 17th July to "tell her" that she is "part of a team of shills". I'm pretty sure my final correspondence with her took place prior to that date. But if my dates are wrong, I'm sure "Poseidon" and Linton would be delighted to correct me. So, if I didn't know that Bates was part of a team until 17th July, how could I possibly have known that she was part of "a team of shills" on 7th July? Linton claims that Bates was "immediately" identified, right? That is exactly what he stated, wasn't it?

Is this the same Suzette Bates who told Eric Hufschmid of her past drug problems, and who pestered him by phoning him every other day to try and get her then hero to meet-up with her? Why, I do believe its is!



Is this the same Suzette Bates who once controlled Eric Hufschmid's MySpace account? Why, I do believe it is!



Is this the same Suzette Bates who recorded a song where she sings ever so sweetly about how good a guy Eric Hufschmid is and Americans to vote for him as president? Why, I do believe it is!

http://takeourworldback.biz/directory/audio/music/vote_for_eric_hufschmid.mp3

Is this the same Suzette Bates who was still in contact with Eric Hufschmid months after she was supposed to have "ended her association" with him? Why, I do believe it is!

http://takeourworldback.biz/directory/e-mail/bates/e-mail_to_hufscmid_8-12-07.htm

Is this the same Suzette Bates who was still promoting Eric Hufschmid via her SKYPE account months after she was supposed to have "ended her association" with him? Why, I do believe it is!



Is this the same Suzette Bates who Daryl Bradford Smith accuses of breaking his trust? Why, I do believe it is!



Is this the same Suzette Bates who continually tried to induce in-fighting over at wakeupfromyourslumber and incurred the wrath of that site's owner on multiple occasions? Why, I do believe it is!







Is this the same Suzette Bates, the "devout Catholic", who said she was "offended" by the blasphemous, photoshopped image that Linton created and distributed on MySpace? Why, I do believe it is!



So "offended" was Bates by the blasphemous image that Linton created, that shortly after she first hooked-up with him she then announced that Linton the blasphemer was a "cute, smart and rational man".



Here's the blasphemous image that Linton created and which so "offended" HIS friend Suzette The Hypocrette, Defender of Blasphemers:



That Linton created this "funny" image is beyond doubt - he admitted via wakeupfromyourslumber that the image was his:



One must wonder why a "devout Catholic" such as Suzette Bates would involve herself with a man who not only creates and distributes a blasphemous image that depicts Bates' lord and saviour engaged in a homosexual act. One must also wonder why a "devout Catholic" such as Suzette Bates would involve herself with a man who not only believes the holy bible to be a "fairy tale", but who also said "thank fuck" after his unborn child was being aborted while Linton was watching the 9-11 attacks on TV. The teachings of the Catholic church on the issue of the controversial issue of abortion are clear and unambiguous. Abortion is strictly against the teachings of Catholicism and it doesn't matter whether it is traditional or contemporary Catholicism that one may practice because the message remains the same: abortion is a sin which automatically results in the sinner being excommunicated from the Catholic Church.

And what was it you wrote about YOUR friend Bates back in the summer of 2007, Linton? Something about you not trusting her as far as you could shot-put her, I believe?



Don't you feel a tool now Linton? You should. Suzette is your friend now, Linton, not mine. You're welcome to her. Good riddance. With "friends" like Suzette Bates, who needs enemies?



It can be quite plainly seen from the piece I wrote in September 2007, that I am merely responding to attacks that my supposed "friend" Bates had priorly made on myself and Michael Stewart. The fact that Bates had attacked me in public before I responded in kind is easily verifiable, and all one need do is check the dates of when Bates posted her attack-pieces on Michael Stewart and I via the blog she has on wakeupfromyourslumber. I draw the reader's attention to the dates of when her "Imitation beyond flattery" and "PlanetQuo: Truth and Lies" hit-pieces were posted - 13th July 2007 and 19th July respectively. I now draw the reader's attention to the date when "Poseidon" announced that he, Bates and Linton were operating as part of a team alongside Nina "A Possum Princess" Pedersen. That particular date is 17th July 2007. It can be clearly seen that Bates had began attacking me even before "Poseidon" had announced her membership of his team. Let's look again at what Linton has just said (emphasis mine):



There's that word again: "immediately". Linton complains incessantly in his damp-squib of a "hit-piece", "Jim Kerr Nuked", that I "misquote" him. Linton can have no grounds for any such complaint now. I've just quoted him exactly. And even if he did have cause for complaint, it matters not because yet again Linton exposes himself as a liar and a deceiver because the piece Linton links to was written in September 2007 - THREE MONTHS AFTER Bates had first attacked me when she staged the "Tom Goy" fiasco wherein she claimed to have received a "mysterious" e-mail whereas in actuality she knew exactly who has sent her this "mysterious" e-mail. Blatant lying and blatant deception. It's what I've come to expect from this unholy trinity.

But it's all coming to a head now. Linton has brought "the nukes" out and there is much boasting of me having been "nuked" and of Drew J having supposedly "nuked" himself. But since Linton says that he "nuked" me back in 2007, it then becomes self-evident that his first strike completely missed the target. Linton plans to "nuke" me and imagines that I'll come out of it "mortally wounded", but all I ever get hit with are comedy pieces like this one. To quote Linton's own words, Linton's "nukes" are: "akin to an extremely effeminate gay man storming up to you and macing you with his breath freshener, only to turn around, run off in his stilettos and trip arse-up on a fortuitously placed banana peel. Slightly annoying but utterly hilarious, and a waste of an idiot's time."

I couldn't have put it better myself. Kudos to Linton. Corn for the chicken, banana for the chimp.





One item you won't find on Linton's "PlanetQuo" blog though, is a piece that he also wrote in 2007 titled "PlanetQuo and Suzette" wherein Linton accuses me of impersonating his friend, Suzette. Linton was evidently embarrassed hence the subsequent deletion of this post. "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I refer you to the post below as the trial of the People versus PlanetSmear begins", says Linton. What a dick this guy is.



James "Frasier" Linton practices Internet psychiatry without a licence and without a clue and expects to be taken seriously.



And you're a liar, Linton, as I have just demonstrated.





And I look forward to pulling apart whatever you write once you get around to writing whatever it is you're planning on writing.



Yeah....organising picnics in the park must place such a heavy constraint on your time. Looks like you'll have to spend less time "working" as a "horticulturist" i.e. a cannabis-gardener, and spend even more of your time on the Internet than is already the case. At this rate, you'll be lucky to "earn" $85 from your drug-dealing this year.



This is going to be interesting indeed. I look forward to reading Linton's rescue-job on "Poseidon". Tag-team forum posting is such a fun sport to watch.

Good to know, and I'm glad you're having as much fun as I am.



Also good to know, Kerr. You've been very candid about certain details of your life in the posts above, which I appreciate. What volunteer work are you doing?



Two points:

1. I didn't know that you do voluntary work. If that's true, I'd like to know what that work is, if you're willing to disclose that information. You'll excuse me for doubting the word of a proven liar and disinformationalist. If you are in fact working on a voluntary basis, technically you are being "employed" by whatever entity is it that you're working for, and I'll accept that. However, it will still remain true that you are not gainfully employed, ie. receiving an income.

2. You make much of "Linton" being unable to "distinguish between retirement and unemployment". But the simple fact is, they are not mutually exclusive terms. That is to say, you may be both retired and unemployed. Most retired people are - guess what - unemployed. Dickhead.



I think you're trying to wriggle out on a technicality here, limp-ankles. So you're not on a "welfare pension", but you do receive government benefits, right? A disability pension, perhaps. Was Makeham lying about that? Was he lying about your partner receiving money for acting as your carer? Here's Makeham:



Is there no truth in that at all, limp-ankles? If you don't receive money from your 'employer', how do you get by? I think you're receiving government benefits but you're reluctant to admit it.



Kerr loves doing this: Taking quotes out of context and using them anachronistically to construct his bullshit. You'll notice that what was written there is in hypothetical terms - I never directly accused Poseidon of operating a disinformation web site. In fact, when it suits Kerr, he will rave on and on about how I was "promoting" TakeOurWorldBack.com as far back as early 2007:



You flip-flop like a pair of thongs, Kerr.



No, nothing has "been tranformed". Kerr is bullshitting again. Notice that Kerr's screen capture was taken to deliberately preclude the "baseless theories" I referred to in 2007, when the comment was written. In fact, he cuts me off in mid-sentence, as the last character in the text (a full colon) shows. Limp-ankles does this all the time.

I didn't agree with some of Poseidons 2007 theories regarding TFC, which is what I was referring to in the comment. I thought they were baseless, and Poseidon himself has long since discarded them. What I'm sticking to is my opinion that Poseidon's web site is chock full of excellent work, and the limp-ankled foot-waggler certainly can't argue with that. If he could do half as much as Poseidon has for the anti-Zionist movement, he'd be happy as a pig in shit and rubbing it in our faces. But he can't, hasn't, won't. Poor bastard.



You never make me feel like a tool, Kerr. You just entertain me. If I'm not laughing, I'm at least smiling. I love this shit - that's one reason why it's a game I can't possibly lose. That, and the fact that you're so easy to beat.



I'm glad you made some new ones, limp-ankles:



How they can tolerate the smell is beyond me, though, if Makeham is even half right about your hygiene issues.



I'd rarely consume it too, if it meant I couldn't drink the shit without losing limbs!



Thanks for refreshing my memory, limp-ankles. It's been four years, you know, and I guess memorizing your pissed antics wasn't a priority at the time.



Well I'm glad you didn't snuff it, Kerr. I would've never known what a good "nuking" was if you had. LMFAO!



Pretty close if you ask me. Now you're about to say I had an evil agenda to "lie" about it, when the truth is just as satisfying. There was no "lie", I just couldn't remember the details. Passed out, fell down, who cares - you got pissed and lost an arm, you twat.

(To be continued - I've got company now.)

_________________
http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

http://crimes-of-zion.blogspot.com/

I was going to address the limp-ankled foot-waggler's posts paragraph-by-paragraph and line-by-line as I have in the post above, but that will take too long. I don't have the time. Instead I'll address only the best parts in no particular order to maximize the fun and straighten some things out (one and the same thing, really).



You're trying really hard to make me out to be a liar, Limp-ankles, but you haven't succeeded, and you won't. You won't for the simple reason that I'm not one.

I never issued a retraction of my "absurd claim", but it's pretty obvious that I binned it years ago. A site search of WakeUpFromYourSlumber.com will bring up plenty of cases of amicable interaction between Fester and I on the forum there (if I believed Fester to be O'Connell, there'd be no amicability, trust me). Let's try a search for Fester + "Crimes of Zion" + 2008.

Note the dates on the posts. There's this exchange between Fester and I, where I thank him for a contribution:





There are countless others. There's this one, and if you scour the site you'll find many more. I've chatted with Fester quite a lot over the years. Check out this one:



That looks like a pretty explicit revocation of the Fester = O'Connell claim to me, Kerr.



So I didn't "lie" after all, did I, Limpankles.



It's not a zero-sum game at all, Kerr. Your Linton = O'Connell howler was something you held onto for years, and spent countless hours writing long, boring, ridiculous articles about. You admitted that yourself - check out this whopping howler of an extract from one of these dumbarse essays:



FUCKING LMFAO!!! Jesus bro, I've never, ever embarrassed or discredited myself like you did with that one, Limp-ankles. You'd like us to forget about it, but it's simply unforgettable.



As I've just demonstrated, my absurd claim was promptly binned, and as the record shows, Kerr was "certain" of his for years. Here's another major league fuck-up that Kerr was certain about:

http://planetquo.blogspot.com/2009/07/p ... -show.html

It's a must read, that one. It's a laugh-your-fucking-arse-off howlathon. Check this out:



You knew Poseidon was Peter Wakefield Sault, didn't you Kerr. Just like you know I'm liar, and you know O'Connell is honest. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously now?

Do you remember when you knew Poseidon was debus? Here's a quick reminder for readers of this thread:



You did, just like you put your credibility on the line for the Linton = O'Connell disinfo, and your credibility is now shot to shit by it. You don't have any, Limp-ankles. It's just as simple as that. You've spent years, literally, discrediting yourself. All I do is point that out, and it's fun as fuck.



Fuckin' LOL! That was Limp-ankles in an email to Poseidon, whose web site he variously describes as a "Jew-controlled disinformation site" and a "Zionist disinformation site" - the same site he's been mocking me for lauding.

Do you feel like a tool, Kerr? You should. You really, really, really should.

To be continued - I'm out of time again. Life can't always be this much fun.

_________________
http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

http://crimes-of-zion.blogspot.com/

After Linton's urging I seem to have figured out what the content was to that concept I was looking for. however I will say that if morons are too stupid to figure out how to protest in Australia without getting put in jail, then they are really stupid and/or lazy when it comes to researching the law. And if they are intellectually lazy in that way, then they would probably be a liability for the anti Zionist public protests.

Linton can settle this right now and confront lieblich on camera by surprise and confront him about Verint, Mossad, 9-11, Israeli activity down under, which also includes New Zealand and Zev Barkan, etc. He can do it and get an apology out of me (and possibly Kerr) for doubting him, or he can continue to cluck like the chicken of Zion he appears to be right now. It's that simple.

Puffing your chest about past work means dick. It's the same shit people do to justify Alex Jones when he covers for Rome and Zion. "Look at what he's done in the past." Big deal. What's he doing to stay relevant and fresh and hot?

_________________
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.

You and I have radically different perceptions of what "fun" is. I'd much rather be getting on with other things than constantly having to drop what I'm doing to respond to you and the organ-grinding yokel. There was a lull in this four-year battle between March 2008 and April 2009. For over a year, I wrote nothing derogatory whatsoever about you or any of your friends/associates, and to the best of my knowledge, nothing derogatory was written by you lot about me. But that lull was broken when "Poseidon" published the "THE ANTI-ZIONIST PLANETQUO.COM IS NOW A PORN SITE" attack-piece via takeourworldback.com in April 2009. He just couldn't leave it alone, could he? "Poseidon" kicked it all off again. Ironically, he was compelled to delete his disinformation-riddled attack-piece after it had been thoroughly debunked, and after it had been proven beyond all doubt that my former website, planetquo.com, had never been a "porn site", as "Poseidon" had falsely alleged.

Since then, it's been tit-for-tat. He does a piece on me, I do one on him. This is the way it has been since the very start. He drew first blood with the "PlanetQuo Debunked" hit-piece he published in July 2007. That you cannot deny although I wouldn't put it past you to try.



It's a pity you are unable to pay your pal "Poseidon" the same compliment, isn't it? While I have been candid, he's disclosed absolutely sweet fuck-all about himself. Zero. Zilch. Nada. He won't even disclose his name.



All you need to know at the moment, and all you are going to know right now, is that I do voluntary work on a part-time basis and have been doing so for almost three years. But because Dan "Smackhead" Makeham didn't know that, neither did you. As I said in my previous post, Makeham knows very little about me. But that hasn't prevented you and "Poseidon" from accepting everything he told you about me as the undisputed, gospel truth even though just about all of it is a pack of lies that he fabricated so that he get you two goons to do his dirty-work. And like a prize pair of suckers, you and "Poseidon" swallowed the bait hook, line and sinker, so desperate were both of you to use this (dis)information against me in the hope of discrediting me and assassinating my character. As I said yesterday, involving yourself with Makeham was a big, big mistake.


Well now you do. And now that your card has been marked, you should consider ceasing and desisting parroting disinformation that was supplied to you by Dan "Smackhead" Makeham. You would be well-advised to dissociate yourself from Makeham immediately and to publicly renounce him. You would also be well-advised to admit that the information he supplied you was false. If you were to do so, and if you were to apologise for having parroted this disinformation that Makeham supplied you with, I will accept your apology in the spirit in which it is made. You will then retract the allegations that you have made against me on this forum using his (dis)information. That will be the last you hear of Dan Makeham from me. But should you continue to parrot what Makeham has told you, then you will ultimately appear even more foolish than you already do. It's your choice.

While there is a way out of this for you, there is however, no way out of this for "Poseidon". It would be a futile exercise to offer him the same deal as you have just been offered given the frequent usage he has made of Makeham's (dis)information in the attack-pieces he has authored since December 2009. "Poseidon". And even if I were to offer him the same deal that I have offered you, his inflated ego would not allow him to accept. I suspect that your own inflated ego won't allow you to accept either, in which case just keep on digging and I'll bury you with your own dirt.



There are no "ifs" about it. It's true, and this truth will shortly be confirmed as such. Whether you accept this truth is entirely your choice. The disadvantage of you doing so is that you will then be compelled to admit that the information you received from Makeham was false. This will of course make you and "Poseidon" appear very foolish indeed for having accepted this (dis)information in the first place without either of you having made any attempt whatsoever to establish the veracity of that information or the credibility of the source. If you do not accept what I say as being the truth, and I strongly suspect this will turn-out to be the case, you will then be guilty of having persistently repeated disinformation despite the fact that it has been pointed-out to you on multiple occasions that just about all of the information that Makeham supplied to you is actually disinformation.

As for you wanting to know the nature of the work I do, all you need to know is that the work I do is voluntary. I would be willing to disclose my line of voluntary work and post documentary evidence to this effect if and when "Poseidon"indicates that he is willing to disclose his line of work and posts documentary evidence proving that he has a full-time job. You did say in a previous post that "Poseidon" is in full-time employment? You also said in your "Jim Kerr Nuked" piece that "if Kerr wants a little, he should give a little? Yes? Well I want details of what "Poseidon" does for a living and I want to see documentary evidence of it too. And to get what I want I'm offering to give something in return. But I'm not going to reveal any further details about myself, my life, or my private affairs until such times as "Poseidon" ceases to be an anonymous Internet entity who operates under a multitude of aliases, and starts revealing personal information about himself. You get nothing from me until he emerges from the shadows and stops hiding behind an array of pseudonyms. Fair enough?



Are you beginning to have doubts about "Poseidon"? Good for you!



I reiterate what I said in the previous paragraph. You either accept what I say to be true, or you don't. I really don't care either way.



Whether or not I am "gainfully employed" is not the issue. You unequivocally stated that I was "unemployed". But you were wrong. And if not being gainfully employed is an issue, it is an issue from which you are henceforth disqualified from passing judgement on given that you yourself are not currently in gainful employment and haven't been for many years.



Do I? I mentioned it once. You exaggerate, Linton.

You have been aware since 2007 that I am a retired electrical contractor. So too has "Poseidon". I have even furbished documentary proving that I once ran my own electrical contracting business. But this still doesn't deter "Poseidon" from continuing to persist with his false claim that I didn't. As always, "Poseidon" the "honest researcher" just ignores any evidence that does not accord with his propaganda purposes. You and "Poseidon" continue to insist that I am "unemployed" even though this is not the case.



This has to be one of the most piss-weak attempts at spin and face-saving that I've seen from you in the last four years. You stated that I was "unemployed" despite the fact that you were already aware that I was retired. You made no mention of the fact that I am retired. Unemployment is defined by the International Labour Organization as being a phenomenon which "occurs when people are without jobs and they have actively looked for work within the past four weeks".

Since I already have a part-time, non-remunerative job and have not actively looked for work in the last four weeks, I cannot therefore ever be considered to be "unemployed". But this is precisely what you have claimed. You said I was "unemployed". You were parroting Makeham's disinformation. Furthermore, not only did you repeat Makeham's false claim that I am "unemployed", you made a further claim: that I "receive" a "welfare pension".



You need to make your mind up about what you consider to be my employment status. Do you still stand by your initial claim that I am "unemployed", or do you now accept that I retired from full-time employment in 2004, as I have consistently stated for the last three and-a-half years? Or is your mantra going to be "Kerr is an unemployed retiree"/"Kerr is retired and unemployed"? As I say, you need to make a decision as to how to you refer to my employment status from this point on.

But in any event, your "argument" is rendered redundant by virtue of the fact that although I am retired, I am not unemployed. The "you may be both retired and unemployed" example you use does not apply to my particular set of circumstances.



You're the dickhead Linton. ALL retired people are - guess what - retired.





I think not, disinformation-parrot. You're the one who is doing all the wriggling. You are the one who unequivocally stated that: I am "unemployed" and that I "receive" a "welfare pension". Those were your exact words. That is what you said. Now you're back-tracking on what was originally said.



So, you now accept that I am not in receipt of a "welfare pension". In other words: you were wrong. Since you now accept that you were wrong, you are therefore guilty of having parroted disinformation that you received from Daniel Calvert John Makeham. Don't you feel like a tool Linton? You should. If I was standing in your shoes right now, I'd shut the fuck up about Dan "Smackhead" Makeham and begin to give serious consideration to the offer that was made earlier in this post. The more you continue to repeat Makeham's disinformation, the more foolish you are ultimately going to look.

Although you and "Poseidon" tout this self-admitted, mentally-ill heroin addict as an "honest", "truthful", and "credible" source, he is anything but. On the contrary, Makeham is a liar, a deceiver, and a disinformationalist. Dan "Smackhead" Makeham has lied about me. Dan "Smackhead" Makeham has deceived you and "Poseidon", but you two clowns were too busy dancing with joy too notice that you had been duped. You both thought you would be able to discredit me by using Makeham's (dis)information against me. But it is ultimately you and "Poseidon" who will be discredited, not me. When you sleep with dogs, you'll get bitten by fleas.

Yes, I receive "government benefits". Every citizen of the United Kingdom does in some form or another. A free health service, education, public libraries etc, etc



No, I am not in receipt of any "disability pension". I'm doubt if any such "pension" even exists in the United Kingdom.



Unless you can produce a statement made by Dan Makeham wherein he claims that I "receive" a "disability pension", I cannot provide an answer to your question. But if Makeham has actually made that claim, then yes, he would have been lying. To the best of my knowledge, Makeham has never said that I am in 'receipt of' a "disability pension", only you. What your fellow junkie has claimed, however, is that I "basically" "depend on" "benefits from the state". But this isn't what you quoted him as having said.



My "partner"? From where did you get the notion that Makeham's mother is my "partner". I'd be very surprised indeed to discover that it was Makeham who told you this. He knows for sure that his mother and I are not "partners". So if it was him who told you this, he would have again been lying. But did you actually receive this (dis)information from Makeham though? I don't think you did. It looks very much like you got this (dis)information from "Poseidon", didn't you? Nothing new there. "Poseidon" fabricated the claim that Makeham's mother is my partner". It was him who has re-invented me yet again. Unless either you or "Poseidon" can produce a statement that Makeham has made wherein he claims that his mother and I are "partners", "Poseidon" will stand accused of fabricating false information for propaganda purposes and you will stand accused of disseminating that false information.

It was made perfectly clear in the blog post I made on 6th September 2010 that Makeham's mother is NOT my "partner". She is a long-standing friend. You could say that you hadn't read this blog post, but I don't think anyone would believe you if you did. I understand how difficult your position is. If you are to accept the truth of the matter: that Makeham's mother is NOT my "partner", you are by default then compelled to admit that "Poseidon" has lied. But you certainly aren't going to expose your friend's lies. On the contrary, you will continue to try and cover his ass and do damage-control on his behalf. That's fine by me chimp because in that eventuality, your sorry arse gets nailed as well as his.

"Poseidon" says that Makeham's mother is my partner. I say she is isn't, so one of us is evidently lying here. So who is it, Linton, me or "Poseidon"? Which of us is the liar?

One of the few pieces of truth to be found in Makeham's "revelations" is that his mother was indeed receiving wages from me in payment for care assistance provided. It is strange that Linton should ask me whether or not Makeham was lying about his mother being my care assistant. It is strange because I confirmed that this in the blog post that I made on New Year's Eve 2009. So why is Linton asking questions to which he already knows the answer? Linton had read that blog post prior to asking this question. This I know for certain because he quoted part of what I wrote on 21st December 2009 in a post he made further back in this thread.





Yes, here's Makeham.



Here he is again.







So, according to Daniel Calvert John Makeham, I "depend on" "benefits from the state". In a way, he's correct. I do rely upon a range of benefits that the state provides, the benefit of a free national health service in particular. But so too do tens of millions of other citizens of the United Kingdom.


Source: Daniel John Calvert John Makeham via James "Infensus Mentis" Linton

Makeham failed think-through the consequences of his Kerr "was forced to" "give up" work because I lost my arm statement. Although Makeham has convinced Linton and "Poseidon" that he "knows" me and that he "knows" lots about me, it can be seen from his statement that this is not the case. Dan Makeham "knows" so much about me that he couldn't even get a simple, basic fact correct. I did not "give up" work because I lost my arm and "obviously" "couldn't" do the job anymore. I lost my arm in the 198Os. I retired from my usual occupation as an electrical contractor in 2004. Boom! So much for me "not being able" to do the job anymore. Boom! So much for Makeham "knowing" me.

According to Makeham the delusional, mentally-ill heroin-addict, his mother "has to" "take care" of my finances because I am "too irresponsible" to manage my own financial affairs. I am not entirely sure where Makeham got this idea from. I don't remember ever having any conversations with him regarding my personal/business finances nor does his mother. Dan Makeham is a funny guy. First he tells "Poseidon" that I have "absolutely no money", "nothing at all" before completely contradicting himself in the next sentence when he claims that I spend "every penny" on "chocolate and cakes". But how could I possibly spend "every penny" on confectionery if I had "absolutely no money", "nothing at all" to spend in the first place? This glaring contradiction has been conveniently ignored by Linton and "Poseidon". Both could say that they "didn't realise" and hope to be believes. Such a response just isn't credible. And neither is Dan "Walter Mitty" Makeham, the mentally-ill heroin-addict who these two jokers are trying desperately to portray as "credible".

Makeham claims that after having paid his mother a weekly three-figure sum in wages, I then "scrounged" "shit loads" of those wages back. But if I have "absolutely no money at all", as Makeham claims, then how was I able to pay his mother a three-figure sum each week? One of us is lying here. So who do you believe, Linton, me or the mentally-ill heroin-addict you've befriended? It's time for making your mind up faggot-features.



Which of the blondes do you find the most attractive, Linton, the ones in skirts, or the ones wearing trousers?



None whatsoever, chicken of Zion.



That's none of your business, just as how you get by without having to dip-in to your inheritance money or the interest gained thereupon is any of my business. Don't expect to be taken seriously when you issues denials in public forums that you "don't deal drugs" when you have priorly boasted that you have "earned" $85,000 a year via cannabis.





I don't ask you to provide detailed statements about your financial affairs, Linton/ So don't ask me to provide details of mine.



I really don't care what you think Linton. What matters in this particular instance is what I know rather than what you think.





The sceenshot above is of a post that I made on Linton's "Crimes of Zion" blog on wakeupfromyourslumber in the summer of 2007 wherein I take him to task vis a vis some glaring omissions that he had made in the post I am addressing. "Poseidon" didn't want anyone on Stormfront to see that Linton's "Larry Silverstein and 9/11" piece contained omissions that I had identified. So he cropped the screenshot and edited-out the original comments so to make it appear that the concluding paragraphs of my post were aimed specifically at Brendon O'Connell when they were quite evidently directed at James Linton.

This screenshot above was posted by "Poseidon" on Stormfront in May 2009. Immediately prior to the screenshot is this statement:



But "Poseidon" deceived the members and readers of Stormfront when he made that false statement. He knew full-well at the time he made this post that I was not accusing Brendon of being obsessed with "flying saucers" and "spacemen". This is easily ascertained by going to his Stormfront post and right-clicking the "spacemen" screenshot and then selecting 'properties' or 'copy image location'. In both instances you will see the following URL appear:

http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc56/poseidon888/KerrAttackCoZSpacemen.png



As you can quite plainly see from the "KerrAttackCoZ" part of the URL, "Poseidon" knew at the time that I was addressing James Linton, not Brendon O'Connell. So, not only was Linton's posting-partner taking quotes out of context and using them anachronistically to construct his bullshit, he was engaging in outright deception.











And you flip-flop like a pair of loose-fitting Jesus sandals, Linton.



So, there are no baseless theories still being promoted by takeourworldback.com then? Is that what you are saying? If so, this would mean that you agree with each and every theory that has been posited on that site. If this is not what you're saying, then which particular postulates of "Poseidon"'s that have been posted on that site do you not agree with? The "Christopher Bollyn is a "Zionist agent" theory, perhaps? You don't believe that Bollyn is a "Zionist agent", do you Linton? I recall you speaking very highly of Bollyn. But before I post the screenshots of what you actually said, I thought I'd offer you the opportunity to clarify your position vis a vis Bollyn before I publish. This will prevent any future confusion from arising as to just what you really think about your butt-buddy's baseless Bollyn is a "Zionist agent" theory.



What about your own theories about the "The French Connection", Linton? Do you still agree with amusing theory that you submitted to the readers of wakeupfromyourslumber in May 2007, your comedy-classic, "The French Connection Counter-Op"?

Do you still believe four years down the line that Michael Stewart and I are the "natural replacement" for Daryl Bradford Smith's "disinfo operation"? So you still believe that Michael and I are part of a "Zionist conspiracy" wherein we are "deliberately involved" in "a deliberate transfer of power/allegiance/credibility" that you say to have been "planned by" the "Zionist criminal network" who "set up" Daryl Bradford Smith's "faltering" "disinfo operation"? No, of course you don't. I doubt if you even believed your own bullshit when you first concocted it. This would explain why you switched your original post a couple of months before you eventually deleted the post altogether.

How much metamphetamine, dextroamphetamine, salvia divinorum, LSD, ecstasy, ketamine, dimethyltryptamine did you consume prior to concocting that pile of manure, junkie-boy?



Oh yes, "Poseidon" has indeed long-discarded his Daryl Bradford Smith is a "Zionist agent", Daryl Bradford Smith is a "pedophile", Daryl Bradford Smith is a "nut", Daryl Bradford Smith is "delusional" and "psychotic" theories. But only because Smith had been endorsed by Michael Collins Piper after splitting from Hufschmid. "Poseidon" would have looked a right dick had he continued to post against Smith given that Piper is a major influence upon the "Poseidon" entity. "Poseidon" is Piper's friend. "Poseidon" promotes Piper and Piper promotes "Poseidon".





"Poseidon" has also accused Smith of being "CIA-Zionist" controlled", but this was no theory, this was, according to the postulator extraordinaire, a statement of "fact". This is something that should be kept in mind whenever "Poseidon" is telling you that something is a "fact".

"Poseidon" spent the best part of a year making literally hundreds of posts on wakeupfromyourslumber.com wherein he tries to convince the world that Daryl Bradford Smith is a "Zionist agent". Anyone not familiar with the (strawman) role that "Poseidon" played during the "Daryl Bradford Smith Indicted" proceedings can, if they so desire, pour through mountains of long-winded posts that |"Poseidon" made on that forum wherein he "attacks" Smith.

Shortly after Collins Piper had endorsed Smith in the wake of his split from Hufschmid, "Poseidon" then decided that Smith's criminal record wasn't so important after all. I quote "Poseidon" from an undetermined date that fell sometime between 16th September and 11th October 2007 - not long after Piper had endorsed Smith. This statement concerns Daryl Bradford Smith's rap-sheet:



This is what is now viewable via the original URL of http://www.takeourworldback.com/dbs/dbsrapsheet.htm:



Sometimes nothing says quite a lot.

This is what was once viewable via the link given above.

What was that you were saying earlier about no transformations having occurred on takeourworldback.com, Linton?

In the spring of 2007, Daryl Bradford Smith declared to be Scott Makufka a.k.a. "Victor Thorn", a writer of pornographic literature who has a fetish for blow-up dolls. Although I have never shared Smith's belief that "Poseidon" = Scott Makufka, I would not, however, be at all surprised if I were to subsequently discover that "Poseidon" does indeed have a fetish for blow-up dolls. I couldn't imagine him getting laid other than by shagging an inflatable doll or paying some brass nail. I assume, of course, that "Poseidon" prefers women to men. He could be a rampant shirt-lifter for all we know.

http://takeourworldback.biz/directory/a ... ufka_1.mp3

After having declared "Poseidon" to be Scott Makufka and a doo-doo head who works for The American Free Press, Smith then correctly identifies "Poseidon" as a shill.

http://takeourworldback.biz/directory/a ... _shill.mp3

But like his strawman "Poseidon", Smith is another who has performed a 180 degree U-turn. The screenshots below were taken from the homepage of Daryl Bradford Smith's iamthewitness.com site in 2009/2010.









Yeah....Daryl Bradford Smith Indicted indeed. "Poseidon too.



Can't I? Since when did you become the arbiter of what I can argue and cannot argue about. Sorry to piss on your parade, Linton, but myself and others do not share your passionate belief that "Poseidon"'s web site is "chock full" of great work". Which web site of his were you talking about anyway. "Poseidon" controls more than one site. He operates at least three sites that I know of: takeourworldback.com, fugaziquo.net, and planetquoinfo.info. While I'll concede that there isn't as much as shite on his takeourworldback.com site as there is on his fugaziquo.net and planetquo.info sites, surely you are not claiming that I "can't" argue that his fugaziquo.net and planetquo.info sites are chock full of disinformation and outright lies. Is this your idea of "great work"? It sure as hell isn't mine. Opinions are like arseholes - everybody's got one, and you're an arsehole with an opinion.









Yeah....I'm so "poor" I have to "scrounge" "shit loads" of money from Makeham's estranged mother to get by.



I don't have to....you are more than capable of doing so on my behalf.







I suppose I would be laughing a lot and walking around with a permanent grin if my body was full of hallucinogenic, mind-altering substances such as metamphetamine, dextroamphetamine, salvia divinorum, LSD, ecstasy, ketamine, dimethyltryptamin like yours is. Been abducted by any wee, green space aliens recently? Had any "Shamanic" experiences lately?



I think it would be self-evident to anyone reading this thread that you do indeed "love this shit". You thrive on it. But you'll soon have to find someone else to play with. What will you do without me, Linton? You've already lost, Linton. You just haven't realised it yet, but you soon will. Your "Titanic" moment is on the horizon.



I recall you saying the same thing four years ago on wakeupfromyourslumber. So if you "won" the "game" in 2007, why are you still playing your "game" in 2011. You're playing with yourself Linton, but that isn't at all surprising given that you're a complete and utter wanker.



No you're not, chimp. But it is nice of you to admit that you were talking out of your arse when you stated just the other day that I "had no social life outside of the Internet". No corn for the chicken, no banana for the chimp.



There you again Linton, parroting disinformation that was supplied to you by Dan Makeham. You just can't help yourself, can you? The man who says that he finds me "so easy to beat" can't make a post without making reference to disinformation given to him by a self-admitted, mentally-ill heroin-addict, who himself isn't exactly a model of hygiene. If you're foolish enough to accept everything Makeham has told you as being the undisputed, gospel truth, then you are a bigger prick than I had previously given you credit for.



You're welcome, ape-features.





I think not chimp. You thought you could score some propaganda points, but fell on flat on your arse trying. No banana for the chimp, no corn for the chicken.



I wish you would, Linton. The world would then instantly become a nicer place to live in.



But you're the one has been doing all the boasting of "nuking" people as of late, not me.



You weren't even warm Linton.



I had an evil agenda to "lie" about it, when the truth is just as satisfying.

Wow! You're a mind-reader as well as a wannabe shrink who [url=takeourworldback.biz/directory/pages/quasimodo/internet_psychiatry.htm]practices Internet psychiatry without a licence and without a clue.[/url]



No one has accused of lying here except yourself. What a strange man you are.



Yes, I got pissed and lost an arm, you twat. But it's something that I adjusted to many, many years ago. It's not something I talk about much. Indeed, you talk about my missing arm more than I do. But your insults go straight over my head. I'd much rather be psychically disadvantaged than psychologically disadvantaged, which you quite clearly are, you sick, perverted oxygen-thief.



It's a pity your mother didn't abort you then say "thank fuck" after the event.

By the way, Linton, I'm curious as to your when your mother first started fucking monkeys. Was this while she was on safari in Africa, or did she fuck your old man down the local zoo?

I will be here for a couple of weeks more, maybe less. After that, I will make no further posts here regarding Linton and "Poseidon".

(I haven't read all of your new post, Kerr, but I just finished composing this one, so I'll post it. When I clicked on 'Preview' I got this message:



I'm choosing not to 'review my post in light of this'. I'll read what you've written after this has been submitted.)

Drew, thanks for going back over my post, taking it in, responding rationally and not coming back with stuff I've already addressed. I don't mean to call you stupid; it's just frustrating when you have to waste time on points you've already responded to. (I'm ignoring the childish "chicken" stuff because it's water off a duck's back and I've already dealt with it anyway - in the very post you say you now understand.)



Hi Tim, long time no see (or read). I haven't been active on MySpace for years and I can't even remember the last time I logged in. I hope you're well.

First of all, Tim, it may seem pointless to you, and I guess at the end of the day it is, but I love this shit. It's not productive but it's fun, so I get sucked into it. I'm only human. Kerr has been attacking me for years as a "Zionist agent", "Zio-scum", "Zio-creep", "member of the criminal Zionist network", and so on. More recently he's dropped that tactic and downgraded me to a simple "Jew", while holding on to his claims that I'm a "meth addict" and a "drug dealer", positions he immediately adopted when Brendon O'Connell dumped them on the WakeUpFromYourSlumber forum. Believe it or not, when that happened, Kerr and his partner Michael (the "Fugazi" to Kerr's "Quo") were still claiming that O'Connell and I were one and the same. When O'Connell released a video of himself harassing me at my home, Michael commented at WakeUpFromYourSlumber.com that he was amused by the 'puppet show', or something like that (I can't be bothered retrieving the link for the exact quote). In other words, even confronted with video evidence that O'Connell really did exist, they were still clinging desperately to the Linton = O'Connell claim.

I've always been on the back foot, defending myself against these kinds of charges. I've never fought back disingenuously with arbitrary counter-claims about Kerr being the 'real' "Zionist agent" or "Jew". Years ago I flirted with the possibility, confounded by how he could continue to believe I had "invented" Brendon O'Connell when the evidence against that theory was so abundant and conclusive, but I never really believed it so I haven't pushed it. My position is, and always has been, very simple: that Kerr is just fucking stupid, and that he'll resort to lying to back up his assertions. How else can you describe someone who pushes bullshit claims despite mountains of evidence to the contrary? I'm still not sure if he believes everything he says, but I've proven on this very forum that he'll lie if it suits his purposes, and he can't deny that fact. You'll notice in his posts here that he just ignores it - he won't even touch on it, because if he goes there, there's no way out.

I can never lose this game because I'm not what Kerr says I am. Kerr always puts himself on the wrong side of the truth, and as long as I'm on the right side of it, I can't possibly lose the game. The fact is, only one of us can be right. Actually, we've been here before:

Me:



Kerr:



After years of Kerr pushing this bullshit and me pushing back, one of us did fall, and it wasn't me. Kerr was wrong about me being a "Zionist agent" who had invented Brendon O'Connell and all his pseudonyms, and I was vindicated. Hilariously, Kerr is now O'Connell's biggest fan, and he expects us all to simply forget the years he spent promoting his rubbish. The same thing will happen again; only one of us will emerge as the honest one, the one who was telling the truth. It will not be Jim Kerr.



I've made peace overtures to Kerr in the past, Tim, but he's not interested. In 2007 I posted a comment on WUFYS for Kerr's partner, Michael "Fugazi" Stewart, with my mobile phone number on it. I told them they were welcome to call me in order to suss out the subject of their Clouseauesque "investigation", but they turned the offer down. Kerr has already posted a screen capture from that thread:



Their "team" member Suzette called me instead (I haven't heard from Suzette in years, Kerr, and neither has Poseidon to the best of my knowledge), and as soon as she did, Kerr booted her out of the "team". His response to Suzette's email is here - a pretty "immediate" reaction wouldn't you say, Limp-ankles?

Instead, Kerr chose to reconcile with O'Connell, the guy who was originally believed to be a 'figment of Linton's imagination', and the guy who had told Kerr that he deserved to have lost his infant son:



This is the low-life prick that Kerr has now aligned himself with, his fellow Christian and "brother in Christ". If Limp-ankles can show me where I've ever stooped so low, I'd like to see it. I may revel in Kerr's misfortunes sometimes, but that shit is just downright fucking cruel and disgusting.

So before I carry on having fun, Tim, I'll take your advice and have one more go at a potential reconciliation with Kerr. I'll man up, humble myself, drop the bullshit and make another peace offering. Here's my phone number, Jim:

0405 196 695

It needn't change anything; you can still carry on claiming I'm a "Jew" with a Jewish-looking "beak" after our conversation if you feel the need. Give me a buzz, if for no other reason than to get a vibe on whether or not I sound like a "meth-head" "junkie".

It's on you, Kerr. I'm not playing around, I'd welcome your call. You won't be any less of a man for picking up the phone, and I won't be recording anything - I have neither the means nor the inclination to do that. The offer applies to you too, Drew. Let's give peace a chance. I can't lose either way; in fact, I'm probably happier when I'm at "war", I love this shit.

_________________
http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

http://crimes-of-zion.blogspot.com/

Okay, I've read your post, Kerr. I'll give it a while before I respond, in case you decide to take up my offer. But just quickly, I will say that I don't get information directly from Dan Makeham. He's in my Facebook contacts, but I don't correspond with him. If I did, you would have seen more of his claims from me than just that which he's offered Poseidon. I haven't grilled him for information, basically. I haven't felt the need to.

_________________
http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

http://crimes-of-zion.blogspot.com/