Ry wrote:
Orwell ghost why did you just make a quote of my post and not reply naything to it? Were you just showing blondbomb that I was not holding my tongue? It was a odd reply. Did you write something and delete it by mistake or something?
I can never get a clear defintion of the illuminati or any evidence with it and 911 or Iraq. The best they ever get is guilt by 6 degrees of association.
Well that sucks balls.
I put a reply inside your quote after each statement, I put mine in bold, but nothing I wrote shows up.
That really sucks the big one. I spent over an hour typing out responses to each ane every paragraph in that quote.
Screw it.
Lets just get down to the basics...
do you think the NEO-CONs = Zionists?
do you consider them Christian Zionists?
Religious Zionism, which is what we are up against, didnt come into play till the early 1900s. You can say its been around for 3,000 years, but thats just the mentality that Israel should have its own nation, which is what Zionism is defined as.
So sure its been around for a very long time, just like the Muslim Religion, but it was not untill recently that the radical fundamentilst version came into being.
You brought up PNAC and its Zionist members, but PNAC came from the New American Citizen Project that was created by our current Drug Czar, or should I say Drug Kingpin, cause thats what the Bushs Drug Czars are.
Look into daddy Bushs Drug Czar during his first term, he had a multi million dollar Vega habit.
They scale back money for prevention and treatment and send the money from the War on Drugs to ensure the CIAs shady drug trade.
Atta is a current day Barry Seal. In all probablity is still alive and still smuggling drugs.
But Im getting ahead of myself.
The Israel Zionists would not orchestrate a 9/11 without the expressed consent of the NEO-CONs.
Im not saying Zionists arent guilty, Im saying they are partners with the NEO-CONs and the dark cabal of the Catholic Church, joined together for common goals.
The Zionists would not be so bold as to risk their cozy relations with the US, they must have had the NEO-CONs approval.
It was just like with the USS Liberty, we wanted it to be sunk and we had Israel do it so that it could be blamed on Egypt. Thats why we didnt want it investigated, because they attack us for us.
Yes Silverstein is guilty and the Sears tower is next, he bought it back in 04.
And yes the FBI had a hand in the 93 bombing of WTC and supplied Salem with a live bomb when they could have just as easily gave a decoy.
As for the Anthrax attack look up Stephen Hatfield and Jerome Hauer. THEY DID IT. After Hatfield was pinned as the prime suspect was when the Russian and Eqyptian were touted as possible suspects. USAMRIID Fort Detrick Maryland and the SAIC. Military grade Anthrax and the place was demolished by guess who? Controlled Demolitions Inc.
Coincidence?
There is no doubt whatsoever that Zionists were heavily involved.
Im not contesting that.
I just dont think they played any bigger of a role than the NEO-CONs did and I think it was authorized by this Black Pope. Who commands the army of Jesus.
Dont you think its very possible that the NEO-CONs and the Jewish Zionists are so cozy because the Jewish Zionists in question have accepted Jesus as their messaiah?
Thats the definition of a Christian Zionist, a Christian that believes the state of Israel is biblical prophecy and that they commonly believe that to fullfill prophecy a significant number of Jews will accept Christ as their personal savior.
So if you believe that the NEO-CONs are Christian Zionists, and the Jewish Zionists are recieivng these massive donations to Israel, wouldnt the common belief be if you want to get in good with the powers that be to accept their dogma?
And to whom do the NEO-CONs or Chrisitan Zionists serve?
The radical section of the Church.
Opus Dei is real, Jesuits are real.
They are in very high places of power in our government, heads of CIA, FBI, members of the Supreme Court etc.
These people take an oath every year that abolishes all other oathes they may have taken.
They are what JFK tried to warn about in a little heard of speech just before he died. He said our enemy today relies on infiltration instead of invasion, he was refering to the CIA and secret socieities like the Jesuits.
He new the score and they killed him for it.
The order was given by the Black Pope which was relayed by 1 Cardinal Spellman from NY. The CIA was used naturally. E Howard Hunt and all that, George Bush Sr as well. He was in Dallas that day and he did meet with Hoover the following day about the incident. Even though he claimed being named the CIA director he had no ties with the CIA. Even though he was a Bone brother to the recruiter and pops was good friends with the CIA creator Allen Dulles. And he did run an offsore oil drilling company, which was a CIA front, called Zapata Oil 30 miles off the coast of Cuba.
So if you are counting Bush, Cheney, Hauer, Hatfield and company as Zionists then I guess I agree with you to a degree, but who do the Zionists answer to?
I think its a simplified answer and that a darker and even more sinister cabal are pulling their strings, but yes Zionists are very guilty.
Do you know why Alex Jones steers clear of the Zionist angle?
Because he is a Jesuit co-adjutor and so is Charlie Sheen and pops Martin.
Zionism can be led back to the Jesuits.
Thats why Jones only gives up certain information and leads us on a wild goose chase for these global elitists.
Just read the Jesuit oath sometime.
And dont be see quick to discount them and their role they play into all of this.
The new version of Vatican Assassins is coming out soon.
The Google Video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 1643775425
another link...
http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/vatican-ny.html