Anti-Neocons

Hufschmid was bang on about the Iran-Syria thing and that's all that link that I got from his site ON THAT ISSUE, is allowed to count for logically speaking. As for you saying I rely only on Hufschmid's claim that Bollyn is still under pressure, you are mistaken. I have said again and again that Robert Stockman of crashrecovery.org has pointed out some weird things too. THAT IS WHY I WENT BACK AND LISTENED TO HUFSCHMID. I found confirmation independent of him.


In this clause you use a comma to seperate a threat to get a weapon from his running into the house to get his brother. Now I have seen no proof Bollyn implied he would get a weapon.


Oh really?

He said Michael was a dead man walking in that his work and credibility would be neutralized. It was. See for yourself.
http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived ... topic=5995
As for the mouths thing, he was being figurative again. In other words, he is saying like Tsarion, you guys will be embarrassed into silence once more people catch on to the Vatican thing.


I have proven so on this board.
viewtopic.php?p=151346#p151346
One of the ways I did it, as you will see, was to expose a bait and switch tactic that was so shameful, no response was ilicited back to me after I exposed it. LOL.


Dishonesty or ignorance? What I have been saying? I have linked to something at Oxley's site which is him citing OTHER PEOPLE'S CLAIMS about Israelis nuking the trade towers. A lot of it comes from Dimirt Kalezov, and he rejects the micro nukes theory. As one should since debus, an admitted agent was trying to sow confusion on the matter.


Chemtrails as used in weather manipulation have been confirmed by the Discovery Channel
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1a4bt ... shortfilms
as well as the History Channel.
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo ... y_Channel/


You claim the decoration is meaningless but you have to prove the Rothschilds are at the top of the pyramid. And that is simply not the case. They are frontmen. So if these frontmen, have a frontman to the tune of Murdoch, my point still stands. Are you going to be one of the many people who have avoided my challenges such as here?
viewtopic.php?p=153769#p153769


As for the validity of Barry Chamish's claims about the Vatican controlling Israel behind the scenes, his work ties into my challenge/series of questions I linked to above.


That is quite the serious accusation that Kerr photoshopped those Hebrew letters into that email of Dan's. If it is true, then I would have some serious questions for Kerr. Kerr, if you are still reading this, how do you respond to this? Poseidon actually has me curious about you now.


Eric Hufschmid has talked about Isarelis and 9-11, and about the holocaust. Now Hufschmid didn't talk about Edgar Steele, but he did get me to question Hal Turner and as it turns out, Turner was an FBI agent. And yet, I have heard people attack Hufschmid for maybe being a Jew or being connected to Jews. So someone could do at least three of those kinds of good things and still be problematic. But after being tricked by that photo as I admitted earlier and having debated with you, it seems you are not a Jew. Just someone who disagrees with me a lot.


I have stopped listening to a lot of Hufschmid and Bollyn stuff simply because they produce nothing new and in my opinion, only go a little distance up the conspiratorial pyramid. They don't touch Rome, which needs to be touched, something you don't agree with.

_________________
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.

Looks like bravenet has suspended takeourworldback.biz.
http://www.takeourworldback.biz/

Here is what Jim Kerr has to say.


I bet the sayanim rue the day I bothered to get into this mud slinging and dared to quote from Kerr's site time to time. Not least of which includes one part where Steve Johnson said he was not Jewish, but then Kerr published an email where he admitted he was. Point for Kerr.

_________________
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.

Kerr continues to push bullshit despite knowing full well what he's doing, but I'm sure Drew J. will somehow find a way to spin it into another "point for Kerr". Classic.

_________________
http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

http://crimes-of-zion.blogspot.com/

That's your beef? That he added an S? How about NOT misdirecting from the main thrust of his argument. That it seems a little curious that while you attacked Michael Sutherland's group FRIENDS OF ISRAEL, they have a website of their own that promotes your work. Now why would they promote a site of someone that is supposed to be opposed to it? Why would the Sayanim promote a website that attacks them? Oh right, because you are safe as Keyser admitted in court. Because as shown earlier, you debate the easy things like the obvious occupation in Palestine, instead of going for the hardcore things like exposing Lieblich. Remember how it was exposed that you don't go after the bigger fish, and that is why those bigger fish are leaving you alone?
viewtopic.php?p=155708#p155708
In fact so much so that they are promoting your bloody work?
Quit thumping your chest about how many protests about easy things to debate about that you have organized and start doing some real exposing. Go after the big Lieblich type fish you coward. Get in his face with a camera. Pump out those DVD's I suggested at your rallys. You're the closest and most ablest as well as a huge bragger about what you can (and have) accomplish, so you should be willing to do it alone and then show us all up and make us apologize to you for doubting your courage. Shouldn't you want to make us look bad? I mean,






Come on.


You claim Judaism is NOT a problem, when it in fact IS. You would know this if you studied Michael A Hoffman II's work. You would also know the Kabbalistic, Talmudic rabbis created the Zionist movement as a way to bring atheistical or left wing Jews back into the fold and under the control of the rabbis. Clearly you don't understand the dialectic working within Judaism to see how much of a problem it is. You are Ted Pike and I am Michael Hoffman. It's just that clear. Oh, and that's HOW many days now that a great Zionist hunter like you has not exposed Lieblich for his connections to Mossad riddled Verint? Sorry, your red herrings don't fly with me, pal.

_________________
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.

What I find hilarious is this post of yours that follows.


Um, in the end, the jury was supposed to decide if the Jews were a race or a religion. That's what the whole guilty charge was about. If Jews were NOT a race then they could not convict. But they did, which implicitly means they determined Jews are a race. However Jews can not be both a religion and a race and they certainly are not a race. The proof is out there, so why the fuck are you siding with the jury on this one. You say the court (or rather, jury) decided Jews are a race. SO FUCKING WHAT? THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT TRUE.





And what is that effect?


Unfortunately that is true. They do love him. But he's a brash Irish mic and unfortunately, he didn't keep himself in check when he should have. However, as Stanley Keyser already said at Brendon's trial, your pro Palestinian group was not anti Jewish therefore, if you are not against a group of people you (wrongly) claim to be a race, then you don't have to worry about being charged with racial vilification. Duh! Stop trying to crucify yourself when the Jews don't even want to.


He can't be right on everything. Claiming Keyser is a Mossad is a bit extreme, of course. But he did expose a racist. He blonged to Chabad Lubavich. Do I have to post a lot of quotes to educate you on how racist those guys are? You should know better.
http://forums.islamicawakening.com/f18/ ... sed-13120/

However, if you are claiming that Leon Wende is not Mossad, then you have a lot of work to do in proving a negative. If an Israeli Jew winds up with sensitive intelligence information on his computer and is also connected to Verint, a Mossad riddle company with connections to 9-11, WHAT THE HELL IS BRENDON SUPPOSED TO THINK AND DO? JUST SHUT HIS MOUTH. It's the same goddamn sceanario all over again. Of course he was scared it would play out in Australia like it did in America and London. And instead of giving him credit, you guys attack him. Unbelievable. The way this video is worded, it basically states O Connell made a claim, and then this person who made the video went to double check it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSkWbsDqrPc
Therefore, it is saying O Connell first made claims about Verint and Sydney before this guy in the video. Then it was up to Steve Johnson to confirm it. Which he did. So in other words, BOC was right, before the gang at southeastasianews.org. And yet Brendon gets attacked for being right? Unbelievable.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynLITN-bLPs

Do you in fact recall what Keyser said to O Connell on the video on their first altercation when he found out O Connell was talking trash about the Israeli organges and what the Israelis did in Operation Cast Lead? "WHAT YOU'RE DOING IS DISGUSTING." In other words, talking about what Israelis do to the Palestinians is disgusting. In other words, Israel has a right to do things like kill civilians and journalists as documented here and nobody should care what Israel does.
http://brendonoconnell.blogspot.com/201 ... r-jew.html
This is the blog entry you quoted and attacked on wakeupfromyourslumber. However if one scrolls down, you see all the awful racist Jews and Israelis and their behavior documented. Not a word about that from you though, eh? Not even an admission that Kerr is on the ball and that O Connell is right about Judaism. Not a word about Hanah Kasher either.
http://www.biu.ac.il/JH/Parasha/eng/kiteze/kas.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MY08-JuClb4
Anyone who says Judaism is not the problem does not understand that,

1. Judaism is based on the anti biblical anti Christian Talmud of the rabbis.
2. Judaism calls for the wiping out of Israel's enemies. Man woman and children included.
3. Judaism is a cult masquerading as a race.

But then again the rabbis in the Talmud say Jesus' mother was a whore, that Jesus practiced Egyptian magic and is boiling in hell in excrement forever. And you did post that picture of Jesus Fucking Christ. Maybe that's why you like Judaism so much, when all evidence and facts should point to you not liking it and criticizing it for it's inherent bigotry.

Here's another jem.

_________________
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.

Drew J, you are so not worth responding to, but in case you've managed to confuse people with your idiocy, I'll address some of your remarks.



Kerr (and now Drew J) suggests that Anti-Semitism.net is "promoting" my work. False. WakeUpFromYourSlumber.com member Andie531 has already explained how Anti-Semitism.net works:



And here:



As Andie531 and myself have already pointed out, Anti-Semitism.net is also "promoting" FugaziQuo and Brendon O'Connell.





My "beef" is that even after reading my piece, which proves that Anti-Semitism.net's "promotion" of Judaism Is Not The Problem is meaningless, Kerr has gone ahead and written a new article which pushes the same, long-debunked bullshit. Are you starting to get the picture now, Drew? Are or you deliberately promoting disinformation? The latter seems more likely, because it's not likely that someone can be so stupid.

From Drew J:



False. Anti-Semitism.net has nothing at all to with Friends of Israel WA. It is not their web site, or a "website of their own".

Now to this other nonsense about my alleged love for Judaism.



I've already addressed this in the Jim Kerr 'Nuked' piece.



Did you even read my article, Drew? I've never said Judaism is not a problem. On the contrary, I've always pointed out its racist, supremacist nature, and my article explicitly identifies it as a problem for those reasons and others. My position is that Judaism is not the problem, and I needn't reiterate here what I've already written an entire article about.



You're a nobody, Drew. You're a poster on a forum, nothing more.



Thanks for the sideways compliment, but it's already been pointed out how ridiculous it is that Brendon O'Connell's arch-enemy should be the only one expected to pick up where that dick left off. So that's "HOW many days now" that O'Connell's Perth supporters haven't "exposed" Lieblich on camera? Time's a wastin', fellas.

_________________
http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

http://crimes-of-zion.blogspot.com/

Now to your second, ridiculously stupid post.



I haven't "sided with the jury". As is plain to see, I merely pointed out their ruling, and that it is now Western Australian law that Jews are both a religion and a race. Here is my position on all this:



From Drew J:



False. A directions hearing was held in the beginning (not the end) to determine whether Jews were a religion, a race, or both. There was nothing "implicit" about it. The jury made a very clear ruling on that issue. You don't seem to know what you're talking about.



I agree. But if O'Connell had done his job properly in court, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Even Kerr has admitted that O'Connell fucked up bigstyle by not concentrating on the race issue.



Source



Are you blind? Do you even read my posts before mouthing off? See the text underlined and in bold, above. Do you deny that some West Australians will now be afraid to speak and write about the racist, homicidal nature of Judaic extremism now that they know they could be sent to prison for it?



As that idiot Kerr would say, "a candid admission". Finally some truth from Drew J, the increasingly apparent Zionist shill.



I'm not just about "the occupation", as you keep falsely suggesting. For years I've been writing and posting information about Israel and 9/11, Judaism, the so-called "Holocaust", and more. Have you even seen my sites? I might work with FOPWA occasionally, but I am not FOPWA. I go much further than they will ever be prepared to. So yes, unfortunately I do have to be concerned that I could be next, dipshit.



He "exposed" a racist. What an achievement. Thank God for Brendon O'Connell.



Bingo. You just hit the nail on the head with regard to the genius behind O'Connell's game. He makes baseless claims that build him a fan base of idiots like yourself, who then claim that it's up to people like me to prove a negative, which as you point out, simply is not possible. Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the person making the claim? Apparently not, for stalwart hero-worshiping fools like Drew J.

Man your bullshit is so easy to demolish and you yourself are so self-evidently clueless that I'm going to leave it there. You're just not worth my time.

_________________
http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

http://crimes-of-zion.blogspot.com/

I wonder how Andie knows this. If he can prove it, fair enough.


So in other words, it's not necessarily a promotion, but rather a database they are building of anti semites in the world. So which are you? Do they view your site the same way as they do say Brother Nathaniel's? Or are you one of the safe anti Zionist, but not anti Jewish ones, that doesn't hate all Jews?


I hope you only mean by bullshit the stuff you and Andie have talked about and not all those videos showing racist Jews and Israelis because those are dynamite.


I can be stupid enough to see Kerr made an apparent mistake here, but not to stupid to see that he is correct in that you are a coward for not confronting Lieblich. If you wanted to prove us wrong, you would. But your inaction is proving us right.

From Drew J:



My mistake. however, their interests do overlap at the very least.




I have read your article, and I stand by what I say. Example.


Doesn't matter if they are religious Jews. They still consider themselves Jews since they believe in the race bullcrap. And if it wasn't for the bullshit talmud and kaballah being created and all those Zionist bibles and new testaments out there, those who become secular despite being raised in a Jewish household, would have never been brought back into the Jewish fold with the myth that was deliberately perpetrated FOR THE SECULARISTS BY THE RABBIS, that Jews are also a race. If you don't think these allegedly secular, atheistic Jews aren't freemasons or at the very least kabbalists, then you are a fucking ignoramus as you have NO IDEA how deep freemasonry goes into politics. Especially in American and Israel. So once again, thanks to the Talmud-Kabbalah-Rabbis we have the myth of a Jewish race that was created in order to keep non religious Jews in the fold. Michael Hoffman is right where Ted PIke misses this. And you do to. Therefore to reiterate, you have no idea how deep that dialectic goes. I am Hoffman. You are Pike. If you think these guys didn't bond together as Jews as well as Zionists, you are the one who is ignorant.


I don't remember disagreeing with this. So this ad hominem seems irrelevant.




Passing the buck again so you don't have to prove how wrong we are when we say you are afraid to go after the really big fish.

[/quote]
Okay, so you're BOTH cowards? Suits me!

_________________
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.