Anti-Neocons

Watch the majestic joos as they peacefully graze in their pasture of love allotted by god the Sheppard, sharing it with all as they should do. It is after all the only democracy in middle east the tv yells.. IF you’re the right kind of joo..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MgGtIWJoPc&feature=related

_________________
Know your enemy

I don’t believe in collectively hating anybody had I not been hated upon first. It appears i have been hated upon first, when referring to those disgusting inbred freaks of the Orthodox persuasion or one of the many Jewish faiths that hate you and I. Those insane evil inbred thug’s in the above link which is part 9 of 12 captures the Zionists talking candidly about their hatred for everyone. The clips are 1 min long or less, if you watch them all you’ll see their brains working feverishly to crush destroy the weaker outnumbered people of the wrong faith like wild animals. The camera person is with a Jewish person as they point out to the head jew of this psycho group, he starts saying, oh she is one of the bad jews that jesus took away she probably has a black baby,” yes drink that coke and have a black baby” he yells at the jewish person not on their team.

The jews against Zionism movement is small isn’t it, almost nonexistent the only time I hear of it is when somebody tries to prove there is some jews against the Zionist regime and shown a little picture of 6 or 7 rabbis holding signs saying Zionism is not Judaism. Like I would believe the masters of deceit, they are told to lie to all non Jews whenever it furthers their cause so i don’t know why everyone assumes that the rabbis in the anti-Zionist movement are sincere. I’m sure there is a few out there actually i know they are out there, but the fact is so many non religious jews and “normal” jews are out there keeping quiet about the Zionuts is disturbing, or being wilfully ignorant because their kind of on the same team and is beneficial to them is bullshit. Like Dr Finkelstein says “there is large problem with American Jewry right now”

_________________
Know your enemy

well in Islam, there is technically no reason to deny evolution.... i don't really believe in it fully due to lack of concrete proof, but its not a theory i throw out the window all together... for all we know evolution might have been the way god brought about our existence on earth... alahu3alam

Except for that whole creation story and man being placed on earth by god. If you ignore that then you're fine, but then you'd also being ignoring that part of the religion. What most religious people do to keep their beliefs is re-interpret the text to mean what they need it to say in direct contradiction from what it actually says and how the religion was actually practiced for over thousand years. They suddenly decide it means something new. This is called an ad hoc hypothesis. They just keep changing the story as reality forces them to.

Thus religious text never mean what they say, they always say whatever you mean. AKA its just a cloak of authority for ones own world view from their own imagination.

Islam has the same Adam and Eve story as the other two religions in fact Adam is still Adam as well, not even the name changed. And Abraham is Abraham and Issac is Issac etc. It's the same bullshit with small improvements because it came centuries later.


People hate Jews because of the actions of Zionist. And generally people don't like racist, because racist people don't like them either. Judaism IS intrinsically racist, and it takes an act of religious hypocrisy to make it non-racist. This is an act most Jews do the same as many Christians and Muslims now have to incorporate the idea of evolution in to their religions and drop the idea of the divine right of kings as the West is now democratic and many Islamic areas have also abandoned the monarchy system. Religious people are rational, they just lag behind intellectually a couple centuries from everyone else due to stubbornness and rigid dogmatism.

_________________
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

Google version of War by Deception
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

there is nothing wrong with reinterpretation, no shit someone 1000 years ago is gonna understand the txt differently due to limited knowledge, however quran was meant for all time and its interpretation will continue until judgment, this is known among Muslims...

and so according to you, because im a Muslim that means im centuries behind you intellectually?? that's super arrogant.

AKA it had no divine inspiration it was written by men and has nothing to do with an actual god.

Messing up whole systems like divine right and blood inherited government isn't some tweaking it's a complete change. Owning slaves and not owning slaves isn't some small change they are direct opposites. The religion changed with the times because in time there was better knowledge of course that same knowledge was available at the time it was written by secular philosophers or even way way before it was written but no one listened to those people. They didn't claim a divine source.

It's ridiculous to say when it says stone this person to death what it really means (according to me) is don't stone this person to death.

I'm sorry if it mean the negative it would say so. It's just wrong. It wasn't the wrong
"interpretation" the book is just wrong. The re-interpretation is an excuse a way to make it say the exact opposite of what it says and blame the fault of people for reading it wrong instead of the book just being wrong.

If you can just change the meaning of what something says even after it had been practiced that way for a thousand years, if you can just change what something means no matter what it really says, then it no longer means anything at all.

A person can whole up a book for their own agenda and say god hats fags, or god doesn't hate fags.

A rational person would say god doesn't exist, and you hate fags. The book is a cloak of authority be it for good principles like charity or the insane, like Zionism. The thing is you can still hgave the good stuff with no religion, but its much harder to generate and finance the evil shit without it. "You can't burn witches when no one believe there are witches."

and that's not some ancient example people still burn women in africa.

Judaism breeds collectivism, it teaches kids at a young age to divide the whole world up into jews and non-jews and that is simply psychologically unhealthy. It can be over come. But there wouldn't be anything to over come if they simply didn't teach it.

_________________
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

Google version of War by Deception
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

ry you obviously dont get it at all, im not talking about changing what the txt says, or ignoring certain parts... if you ignore a certain part then that falsifies the entire document, reinterpretation means reinterpretation, maybe you need a definition, go grab a dictionary...

for example, sometimes words in Arabic have multiple meanings.. to get more specific, there is a verse in the quran that says "O you who have believed, do not approach prayer while you are intoxicated".... now the word that was translated to "intoxicated" was widely considered to mean like drunk, high, whatever... however, some have interpreted based on the multiple meanings of the word, that its not limited to just intoxicated by drugs, but that if during prayer you mind is wandering, your not focused, thinking of something else, that is a form of intoxication....

THAT is the kind of reinterpretation im talking about, not negating certain parts of the txt..

Yeah and you don't get what I am saying. That oh this word could mean this other thing excuse isn't what I am talking about. There is no way to play around with words to get evolution out of what is CLEARLY creationism nor is there a way to say that god ordering people to beat slaves mean to not beat slaves. Other than to totally reject portions of the text and invent your own meaning yourself and just decide based on nothing that that is what it must have really meant. This is because you start with the conclusion that it has to be right and so its your job to find a way to make it right. The other term for that is called make believe aka makebelieve.

We're not talking about minor problems here like oh they dated that by moons instead of months back then or anything like that, we're talking about massive concepts like the belief in magical creatures, being brought back from the dead, etc
That junk is not explained by words with multiple meanings, it's just wrong.

Otherwise I could take any story even from mother Goose and find a poetic way to make it say what I want it to say. You could make the smurfs an allegory for communism if you wanted.

I'll pick on the bible since I don't think your head will except bashing on the qurran so you can see it there.

Exodus 21:20 "If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property

Ok that clearly assumes slavery as it is a law about how to conduct punishment of your slaves. It also clearly states that the slave is the person's property. So they are not a servent or any of the common excuses.

We also know from history that they damn well meant slave when they said slaves that is evidenced by 2800 years straight of slavery by the people that wrote this crap.

It also implies that beating them is an acceptable form of punishment so long as they don't die from it. This is cooperated y about 400 other passages in the Bible as well as the open practice of slavery by Christians and Jews for many centuries.

They were not talking about indentured servants or prisoners of war, or people in debt, they were talking about slaves period.

You know when the Qurran instructs people to stone someone to death for a crime, it doesn't mean to NOT stone them to death. You can wiggle around as to what crime actually counts for a stoning but you can't wiggle out of the stoning and death part. That all by itself is stupid enough.

We can talk about the methods for animal sacrifice in any of the books but we can't really deny THAT there was animal sacrifice. You can argue about what a king said, but you can't argue against that there was a king at all which already dumb enough. A god isn't beholden to culture, a god is above it, even other regular people knew better and how ridiculous it is to be governed by someone born into a certain family with total control.

See this too
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=21198
it's a video

_________________
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

Google version of War by Deception
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you