Anti-Neocons

One more time:

Calculate the amount of thermite needed for any, any building at all you pick it. Then calculate how much that would weigh. ANY BUILDING

Not sure how we need evidence for that.

Leds wrote:
All the demolitionists I've talked to in Georgia said it looked like controlled demolition.

All the experts I talk to said it wasnt.

Nice, the other term I mentioned is actually more for electrical/mechanical engineers. Wasn't sure about civil. If you ever heard "If it doesn't have two engines and two pilots, I'm not getting on it" thats what I meant by redundancy. My point is, important things built in modern times should be stronger than what the media/others are trying to tell me.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=otoh2pJpgY8

The calculations you presented are based on the assumption that only thermite and/or thermate were used, and doesn't factor in HOW it was used. What is being claimed, is that it was used as a cutter charge. These are shaped charges that are used to cut through steel in demoliting large structures.

Now the question is, how much do cutter charges weigh, and if thermate was used for them, how much would they require?



Which is strange, since immediately after 9/11, it seemed to be unanimous, that the collapses weren't soley caused by the impact and any subsequent fires.

One wonders why they changed their minds, and why (if they truly believe they were wrong) that they made the initial claim in the first place.

Sorry but I hold actual building demo crews in higher regard on this subject than "experts".

_________________
Is your view of the world in sync with what you 'know' about the world?

"The state breaks everything and then blames freedom.
The state destroys everything and then blames those who interact voluntarily for that destruction."
-- Stefan Molyneux