Anti-Neocons

phys's way of arguing is to stick her fingers in her ears and say I just dont believe in facts, science or sense. I have my intuition and can create my own science but um its not based on the actual event but a different event that fits my conclusion.

Phys STOP DODGING THE QUESTION the buliding was 47 stories high and disappeared in 6 seconds straight down. Fire does not melt an entire builing of steel and concrete and turn it into dust in seconds. You coudn't even burn a chimney that fast much less a sky scrapper.

_________________
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

Google version of War by Deception (Magic Bunnies)
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

What the F...?

_________________
End of Days

I have already answer all of these question for you, a few times. Check the prior threads.

I havent found your agrumnt on this

Hey guys! Tonight is Kareoke Night at the Skull & Bones log cabin, who's coming?

Hey check out this site (there's even symbols for the illuminati's) :

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net ... 911_morons

I'm still a little uneasy on this subject but I definitely think Ry's argument is better than others I have seen. That site you posted is retarded (although I'm not sure what you want to show by posting it). The guy apparently thinks the US government is a group of angels. He also throws a truck load of other fallacies at the reader. Which leads to another point: he focuses on Lose Change and the weak theories (which have been shown to be crap). Take a look at this short video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=OpTIWgk1ZqE . Also, from my own knowledge, Engineers don't build things with such a high chance of failure, there is something called redundancy among other things. However, I honestly don't research this much, mainly because other crimes/persecutions are being committed.

It's called "factor of safety" and engineering term and it's not uncommon for an individual structural member to be sized to hold 10x it's actual load so it can compensate in the event of damage to to other members.

Just so you know. This was a joke.

like the video I posted:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saHs6J0OXVI

As I've said before, it's largely conjectural. there's really nothing in the way of solid proof, since most (if not all) the physical evidence was so quickly disposed of.

Phys, the calculations themselves are flawed, as they are based on presumptions and are almost entirely hypothetical. The buildings were pulverized to the ground, and however much you want to counter the demolition theory, the fact remains that it is still a more plausible theory than the truss or pancake theories.