Anti-Neocons

reply to my thread

_________________

Thunk Army, it would seem that you are going to many debunking sites. I did this, and polluted my mind with bullshit. If you want to debunk something, go here

http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=64

there, you can find out what a good idea the Iraq war is!! (to be fair, there are lots of anti war people there too). Also, you´ll find out just how evil Muslins are...

If you want to read something depressing, look up the Franklin Case on the JREF. They claim the victims (children, rape victims) are all liars, even though Paul bonachi recently got $1m compensation (I have the transcript of the Judge´s sumary. It is disgusting and very real) After reading that stuff there, I lost my temper, and got a week´s suspension. Cunts!

here´s a thread about the Franklin cover up. note that it was 2 years old, I revived it today.

When an obvious, terrible crime like this is covered, "debunkers" normally just refuse to discuss it.

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=45702

only 5 posts long, check it out.

I would say, go to scientific sites. Motive isnt evidence. Just the same as lack of evidence isnt evidence. Just as the wonderful dr shermer indicates we have to keep track of the hits as well as the misses. We cant just make jumps w/o evidence.

FYI: I have seen the 9/11 truths sites online.

In a quick search through the net, I found these, which might be helpful for you:

911physics debunking 911myths

A Refutation of the Official Collapse Theory

Claims of Severe Damage to Building 7

"Pulling" Building 7

Debunking 9/11 Website Debunks Itself

WTC-7 Collapse Footage Shows Unmistakable Demolition Charges

BYU Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samples, Building Collapses an Inside Job

It's important to remember, that the official version, that it was an uncontrolled collapse, has no evidence to support it. Rather, it is entirely structured on conjecture and speculation. Nothing nearly as solid as what the demolition theory already has.

People who wish to argue for the official story, would be extremely hard-pressed to find any actual evidence to support it.

Those who support the official story, would use in defense of it:

- The "confession" videos

- The flight calls

And not much else.

911myths doesn´t "debunk" the dancing isrealis or the Carl Cameron report

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html

keep your hair on mate

"evidence linking the israelis to 911 is classified" said Fox New´s´Carl Cameron (paraphrased)

well, let´s declassify it then. I don´t trust these intel fucks with anything, the drug dealing scumbags. but they know the link between the arrested mossad agents and 911? Tell us please, fuckpigs

How about making the President testify under oath? It´s unbelievable that all this (911 commision) was done in secret, without an oath.

911myths has some of the classiest disinfo out there.

The first site at least, is geared towards debunking 911myths.