Interesting video. I see at the 6:15 mark, the hole that has been obviously enlarged with a power chisel of some sort is clearly evident. That observation comes from over 37 years of construction experience that "this kook" has, kid.
I see the images of the impact the two engines made on Pentagon exterior, but no holes: you have no reply on how an engine was also found *inside* the interior, Ry? Did the cockpit entering the wall create a "vacuum" and suck the two huge engines inside?
Any explanation, other than the usual Psy-Ops tactic of labeling views not to your liking as "kooks, "cults" and "druggies" about how an aluminum and carbon fiber cockpit "drilled" holes through newly super-reinforced ("explosion-proof" construction by British firm called AMEC) concrete and three interior "ring" walls too?
Any explanation why General Stubblefield, a REAL expert on analyzing, from photographs, damage caused by jet and missile impacts, stated that the hole could not have been made by the 757 alleged to have impacted? Is he now a "kook" too? Lots of "kooks" running around in your "reality...."
Do I need to provide links showing the initial impact area free of any "AA jet debris", or that msm reporter Jamie McIntyre, on site when it occurred, stating there was no debris of a plane present? Where are the passenger seats, Ry? The luggage? The vertical stabilizer (tail) impact image? A few pieces of jet aluminum skin easily cut/ripped from desert jet graveyards is no "proof" without addressing real issues. Why doesn't the Pentagon show the plane? How many times have I seen the impact of the planes hitting the towers...so show the plane impacting the Pentagon...or give up the farce, Ry.
Did a missile hit? I think it could have, and I also think it could have instead been charges used to breach walls the military possesses, who knows without real investigation, but I know if the cockpit could drill 5 holes through concrete walls (it could not), the HUGE engines would have too...yet I see only images of slightly damaged (like a super-reinforced/explosion-proof wall would show) round-shaped impact areas with NO HOLES where they supposedly hit the exterior.
Explain without ad hominem attacks, if you can.
Any explanation why the Flight Data Recorder, examined by real commercial pilots, show DATA that PROVES Flt. 77's cockpit door was not breached or opened at ANY TIME during the flight, or are you alleging they are "kooks" too? I suppose they became "kooks" when they read the data, and found that Flt 77 flew 700 ft over the Pentagon that day?
I will not offer theories on how it occurred again, I am stating facts needing clarification, and you are not addressing them. Obviously, Remote Controlled technology, drones, even 757's, are already being shown DAILY to exist as I type, and yet you seem to try to refute that OBVIOUS point...who does THAT benefit, Ry?
Any explanation on how an 8 mile debris trail was documented by local news helicopters in Pennsylvania from Flt. 93, if, as you state, "there was no hole in plane before impact?" Odd, I seem to recall a fellow supposedly locked in restroom on Flt 93 calling on cell phone, alleging he "is seeing smoke".....and ground eyewitnesses stating they saw the plane on fire and flying upside down...."kooks" all, I suppose....
Any explanation why one of Flt 93's engines was found one mile perpendicular to the flight path, defying all known laws of physics, or does asking that question make one a "kook" too?
And, you'll see no allegations by me of "space beams", or "Illuminati" here....or assertions that MOSSAD wasn't involved too, just questions posed you refuse to address, and respond weakly with ad hominem attacks.
Explain why Bobby Eberle, supposedly standing in flight path of Flt 77, wasn't picked up and slammed by the force of the turbulence caused by the jet as it "passed directly over him"...yet can flip over trucks and automobiles, easily witnessed on videos on Youtube? Yes, Bobby Eberle, Jeff Gannon aka Bush's Male Prostitute's Texas-based "Talon News" boss.
Tell me what was being hidden under the blue tarp carried off at the Pentagon, Ry....what was it, Ry, under the blue tarp Ry? "Kook" that.
Go ahead, remove these comments too...and show me your true colors, Ry.
I am saving these comments, and will paste and post them after removal for others to decide your veracity, young man.