Anti-Neocons

I'm still making annotations. But the video is up. Go give it a thumbs up.

and War by Deception

_________________
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

Google version of War by Deception
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

updated

_________________
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

Google version of War by Deception
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

The plane was obviously a hologram

j/k

Good vid. I like that cookie monster picture!

Interesting video. I see at the 6:15 mark, the hole that has been obviously enlarged with a power chisel of some sort is clearly evident. That observation comes from over 37 years of construction experience that "this kook" has, kid.

I see the images of the impact the two engines made on Pentagon exterior, but no holes: you have no reply on how an engine was also found *inside* the interior, Ry? Did the cockpit entering the wall create a "vacuum" and suck the two huge engines inside?

Any explanation, other than the usual Psy-Ops tactic of labeling views not to your liking as "kooks, "cults" and "druggies" about how an aluminum and carbon fiber cockpit "drilled" holes through newly super-reinforced ("explosion-proof" construction by British firm called AMEC) concrete and three interior "ring" walls too?

Any explanation why General Stubblefield, a REAL expert on analyzing, from photographs, damage caused by jet and missile impacts, stated that the hole could not have been made by the 757 alleged to have impacted? Is he now a "kook" too? Lots of "kooks" running around in your "reality...."

Do I need to provide links showing the initial impact area free of any "AA jet debris", or that msm reporter Jamie McIntyre, on site when it occurred, stating there was no debris of a plane present? Where are the passenger seats, Ry? The luggage? The vertical stabilizer (tail) impact image? A few pieces of jet aluminum skin easily cut/ripped from desert jet graveyards is no "proof" without addressing real issues. Why doesn't the Pentagon show the plane? How many times have I seen the impact of the planes hitting the towers...so show the plane impacting the Pentagon...or give up the farce, Ry.

Did a missile hit? I think it could have, and I also think it could have instead been charges used to breach walls the military possesses, who knows without real investigation, but I know if the cockpit could drill 5 holes through concrete walls (it could not), the HUGE engines would have too...yet I see only images of slightly damaged (like a super-reinforced/explosion-proof wall would show) round-shaped impact areas with NO HOLES where they supposedly hit the exterior.

Explain without ad hominem attacks, if you can.

Any explanation why the Flight Data Recorder, examined by real commercial pilots, show DATA that PROVES Flt. 77's cockpit door was not breached or opened at ANY TIME during the flight, or are you alleging they are "kooks" too? I suppose they became "kooks" when they read the data, and found that Flt 77 flew 700 ft over the Pentagon that day?

I will not offer theories on how it occurred again, I am stating facts needing clarification, and you are not addressing them. Obviously, Remote Controlled technology, drones, even 757's, are already being shown DAILY to exist as I type, and yet you seem to try to refute that OBVIOUS point...who does THAT benefit, Ry?

Any explanation on how an 8 mile debris trail was documented by local news helicopters in Pennsylvania from Flt. 93, if, as you state, "there was no hole in plane before impact?" Odd, I seem to recall a fellow supposedly locked in restroom on Flt 93 calling on cell phone, alleging he "is seeing smoke".....and ground eyewitnesses stating they saw the plane on fire and flying upside down...."kooks" all, I suppose....

Any explanation why one of Flt 93's engines was found one mile perpendicular to the flight path, defying all known laws of physics, or does asking that question make one a "kook" too?

And, you'll see no allegations by me of "space beams", or "Illuminati" here....or assertions that MOSSAD wasn't involved too, just questions posed you refuse to address, and respond weakly with ad hominem attacks.

Explain why Bobby Eberle, supposedly standing in flight path of Flt 77, wasn't picked up and slammed by the force of the turbulence caused by the jet as it "passed directly over him"...yet can flip over trucks and automobiles, easily witnessed on videos on Youtube? Yes, Bobby Eberle, Jeff Gannon aka Bush's Male Prostitute's Texas-based "Talon News" boss.

Tell me what was being hidden under the blue tarp carried off at the Pentagon, Ry....what was it, Ry, under the blue tarp Ry? "Kook" that.

Go ahead, remove these comments too...and show me your true colors, Ry.

I am saving these comments, and will paste and post them after removal for others to decide your veracity, young man.

@ Tell me what was being hidden under the blue tarp carried off at the Pentagon, Ry....what was it, Ry, under the blue tarp Ry? "Kook" that.

I take it you mean this blue tarp?



This your gonna hate. The Scholars for 9/11 Truth, as well meaning but eventually kooky as they were led to be, figured this one out along time ago. The answer is nothing. Nothing is under the blue tarp at all.

Infact its incredibly light (hence one armed carrying for some guys) as its empty. No really, you can see up into it, see both sides of the base of its frame? See the inside of the right side?

Its just a large rectangular triage tent. Nothing more sinister sadly.

You do have a number of other points and yes your not calling illuminati etc. I dont speak for RY at all but he is of the opinion that a real plane hit, there was real debris and if it was caught on camera at all, it wont ever be shown because there was more than likely charges also placed in that area of the Pentagon to ensure that the financial records area was destroyed despite the AMEC reinforced walls and these explosions would have been visable on cameras and obvious. I personally feel they also wanted to test the effectiveness of the reinforcement renovations they had applied to that area, against a simulated real attack into the bargain.

_________________
"All propaganda must be so popular and on such an intellectual level, that even the most stupid of those towards whom it is directed will understand it. Therefore, the intellectual level of the propaganda must be lower the larger the number of people who are to be influenced by it." - Adolf Hitler - "Mein Kampf" - (1925)
....WAKE UP
"