Abramoff paid for sex slavery trips for congressmen
in light of the Mark Foley
fall out and the fact that other congressmen knew about it for months and how they tried to cover it up make you wonder how far the rabbit hole goes
Tie that in with the Fact that Abramoff knew
about the Iraq invasion back in 2002 a year before it happened.
And it was under Wolfowitz's office that Franklin was spying for Israel. It was also who made the Niger forgeries for the WMD. I am sure Wolfowitz had ordered they create that myth. He admitted it in Vanity Fair that they "settled on WMDs" Then we had Libby oust Plame. Interestingly Jeff Gannon who worked for a fake news agentcy reported on the Niger forgeries tell help cover them up BEFORE the press knew about it. Why did a prostitute have insider knowlegde and such high level access to the White house?
This little Cabal is comprised of Zionist Jews working for Israel, Spying for Israel, and who have dual citizenship with Israel.
What was the Atta double doing on Abramoff's casino ships 5 days before 911??????
I think we know what has been going on when the Zionist lobbies has been involved in these sex slavery rings. This is how the Mossad has been blackmailing the congress.
This goes deeper than anyone knows. I questioned it in my book and siad what "could be" but I did not write about it enough because I could not prove it at that time. But now it is all becoming unraveled. And it seems like I was right again.
Well they can not arrest you without a charge based on any vague definition of fighting terrorism, and now they can torture you and Bush saud anyone who questions 911 is a terrorist. They legalized torture even when they have been illegally doing it anyway, in order to shut us up. They are trying to scare us into silence. They can also spy on you at will
Liberal opposition mainly centered around the morality – or, rather, immorality – of torture, but the debate largely ignored the ticking time-bomb at the heart of this legislation, scheduled to go off, perhaps, in tandem with some future crisis, e.g., another terrorist attack on American soil: the redefinition of the "unlawful combatant" concept that lays the foundations for this administration's reconstruction of the gulag. Here is the new, broadened definition, as enunciated in the legislation recently passed by the House:
"The term 'unlawful enemy combatant' means – (i) a person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents who is not a lawful enemy combatant (including a person who is part of the Taliban, al-Qaeda, or associated forces); or (ii) a person who, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal or another competent tribunal established under the authority of the president or the secretary of defense."
It doesn't say "alien" or "terrorist," although it specifically includes members of the Taliban and al-Qaeda. It says "person" – any person, including American citizens.
I cannot help but register dismay (and intense frustration) when some in the 9/11 Truth Movement start aiming shots at each other, quite often over turf, trivia and minutiæ. For one of many examples, to call Alex Jones a "scumbag" just because his take on the 9/11 story happens to have a different emphasis, is counterproductive, and only serves to strengthen the cause the NeoCons by getting us to lose focus
Alex is not a scumbag. He is a a truth teller. But I do think he went off the wagon with the religious stuff.
I tossed out the daryle bradford smith folks (both of them who are very loud) for slinging mud at all the truth sayers. They have attacked Alex, Myself, and Rivero, as well as Scott Ritter, Paul Watson and a number of other people in the 911 movement.
I gave my review of [url=http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?t=3055[/url]Alex[/url]