I think the security cameras were tampered with by the Zionist security company because they didn't want them to show the faces of the Israeli commando hijackers, not because there were no hijackers.
I am pretty sure there were hijackers. The airlines keep passenger lists or manifests(?) and so they would have known which people got on the plane and how many. Nineteen of those people were identified as hijackers. If they weren't the hijackers who were the 19 that got on the plane? Nobody has claimed them as lost relatives. People who worked at the airport remember some of these passengers with a Middle Eastern appearance. They remember they went through special security checks, and that they couldn't speak English well, and that one of these men almost missed his plane and had to make a run for it.
Also, the phone calls made by the passengers and crew speak of hijackers. Unless you think the Israeli hijackers faked 18 phone calls, including ones that lasted twenty minutes.
I thought the phone calls were faked at one point in time because everything else was faked, but after looking at the transcripts of the phone calls and the timelines of the calls:
Cooperative research timeline
I no longer think so. It would have been too difficult to fake all these phone calls. How would the Israelis know what to call the people who they called - their nicknames? How did they know how the people who picked up the phone were related to the passengers, and how could they mimic the voices of all those people, their speaking mannerisms and so forth - pretty big task.
Too, too complicated. And too risky. One slip up - one assumption that the person who answered the phone was the mother of the caller when that person had been dead for a long time would expose the hoax.
Besides quite a few of the callers on FL93 caught that flight at the last minute because FL91 had been canceled due to a cracked windshield. Even if the Israelis had known of the passengers beforehand and had investigated and studied the phone calls of these future passengers through the process of
data mining and human engineering, they wouldn't have had time to do that with those last-minute passengers.
I am certain that the phone calls are real, and therefore there must have been real hijackers on those planes. But the hijackers were Israeli and not Al Qaeda Muslims. The Israeli hijackers ditched out of the planes by parachute in remote fields somewhere before the planes were piloted by remote control into their targets.
That's where the theory of an incapacitating 'gas' comes in. It fits in real well with what was said in the phone calls.
The phone calls give an accurate picture of what happened on FL93: a chilling minute-by-minute rundown of how the hijackers took over the planes, subdued the passengers and made their escape unobserved and unhindered.
Even when the passengers were knocked out, their phone calls relayed information about the hijackings. They recorded sounds that describe what happened after the passengers were disabled chemically. The mechanical sound of the plane door opening a few minutes after the gas was released. The wind sounds that were heard after the door had been opened, and that were heard until the plane crashed.
The fact that there was total silence and no voices to be heard abruptly at 10:00AM suggests that the passengers were affected by some chemical agent that rendered them unconscious at this time.
No sound of gunfire, no sound of huge explosions like a bomb would make, just the report of an explosion by a passenger, not audible to the listener so it wasn't that loud, and the report of a 'white smoke' - this was the aerosolized drug that was released into he main cabin by the hijackers because the passengers were resisting too much and were in danger of breaking down the cockpit door at any moment.
And the report at 10:00 by another passenger that she was feeling funny: like she was leaving her body, and going into a trance, as well as experiencing breathing difficulties - these are the reports of someone undergoing anesthesia.
It seems that the gas was used in all the hijackings. Betty Ong reported that some gas was being used and that some people were choking.
The hijackers used the gas because they had to make sure there were no witnesses to them making their exit from the planes. And to prevent anyone trying to stop them from doing it. Also they didn't want anybody interfering with what they were doing in the cockpit: putting the plane onto remote control or whatever they had to do in there.
The gas was a crowd-control measure - it was used because it acted quickly and would affect anyone who wasn't wearing a respirator.
The parachuting from the plane was accomplished easily enough. All they had to do was get the plane at a low-enough altitude and slow-enough speed, either manually or by remote control. We know that FL93 was at a height of 7000 feet between 10:00 and 10:03AM because the transponders had been turned on between then. The plane crashed at 10:06. We know the hijackers were probably in the plane until 10:03 unless the transponder was turned off electronically by remote control. The hijackers made their jump between 10:00 and 10:03, after they had put the passengers and crew to sleep.
Then once the hijackers were out of the plane, the Israelis in the white unmarked Learjet-type plane who were observing the whole drama of the hijackers getting out of the plane from a close vantage point, watched the plane plough into the ground (driven by remote control) and then they detonated the plane, again by remote control.
The Learjet had been directed to the correct location of FL93 by the information given off by the transponder which was turned on between 10:00 and 10:03.
FL93 was destroyed by ordnance, like all the other planes were, to destroy any evidence remaining on the planes. The Israelis had to make sure the planes were completely obliterated because otherwise they might yield important clues to the investigators such as the presence of the incapacitating drugs in the passengers' bodies. They could also find that the number of passengers' bodies were four short and surmise that the hijackers had left the planes before the crashes. Lots of other evidence like that. The Israelis had to get rid of the crime scene.
If you think about how the Israelis planned the attack and what they would need to do cover their tracks as well as divert the blame onto another group of people, then all the things that people observed or heard that day make sense and come together as a coherent whole. It almost is like writing a mystery novel when reconciling the theory that the Israelis did the hijacking with the timeline of what happened that day.
