Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ

Board index » Archives by areas of the world » Archived topics here » 9/11




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:42 pm 
Offline
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice

Joined: Apr 25th, 2006
Posts: 31
Location: Sunny Florida
Stuyvesant wrote:
Hello Ryan,

I read your article 911, Iraq, PNAC , All roads lead to Israel carefully and found it very interesting.

But if Atta had a double... who was flying the planes into the WTC buildings ?? Mossad agents are not well known for suicide attacks, muslims are.


Were any of you aware that suicide is totally forbidden in the Islamic religion?? There is no such thing as the "72 Virgin" theory, it is a mis-quotation from the Quaran. Also, they do not prescribe to beheadings either, however the Talmudic Jews do. But, they won't admit to that.

_________________
The truth needs NO LAWS to support it.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:48 pm 
Offline
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
User avatar

Joined: Jun 27th, 2005
Posts: 31563
Location: Japan
The planes were remote controlled. That tech comes from a firm in Virginia. We have been using it (drone planes) since Gulf War one. That is why and how they could manuver it into the pentagon (which was hit by a plane) and WTC 1&2 at such speeds.

_________________
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter

"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us."
Batman
Image
Google version of War by Deception
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed




ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you



Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:13 pm 
Offline
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice

Joined: Oct 8th, 2006
Posts: 3
Ry wrote:
The planes were remote controlled. That tech comes from a firm in Virginia. We have been using it (drone planes) since Gulf War one. That is why and how they could manuver it into the pentagon (which was hit by a plane) and WTC 1&2 at such speeds.


Thanks for your swift response. This explanation was not in the printed copy of your article I read in my daily commutertrain between Amsterdam and The Hague.

Can you please provide me with a link to this 'remote control' stuff in combination with 911/WTC ?

Is it a different technology than the automatic pilot ?

Do you believe that the planes were empty or were the regular pilots simply outmanouvered by the remote technology ? In the latter case they should have been able to communicate their plight with others ?

I have been following american politics very intensively since 2001 (Raimondo, Buchanan, neocon sites). I was aware of OSP, WMD-scam, PNAC, Niger, Straussian deception, demolition hypothesis (rather convinced about this one). Your story however is special in that it connects all the dots rather convincingly.

I have ordered your book. It has the potential to change the course of history. Keep up the good work.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:28 am 
Offline
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
User avatar

Joined: Jun 27th, 2005
Posts: 31563
Location: Japan
Quote:
Do you believe that the planes were empty or were the regular pilots simply outmanouvered by the remote technology ? In the latter case they should have been able to communicate their plight with others ?


Oh the planes were full of people who are now dead however it could be that some of thepeople on the list never got on the plane and are avoiding debts etc.

We have had drone planes for a long time, we even accuse Iraq of having them.

_________________
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter

"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us."
Batman
Image
Google version of War by Deception
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed




ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you



Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:17 am 
Offline
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice

Joined: Oct 8th, 2006
Posts: 3
Ry wrote:
Quote:
Do you believe that the planes were empty or were the regular pilots simply outmanouvered by the remote technology ? In the latter case they should have been able to communicate their plight with others ?


Oh the planes were full of people who are now dead however it could be that some of thepeople on the list never got on the plane and are avoiding debts etc.


Ok, the plane was on a regular flight with crew and passengers. Remote control technology took over and flew the planes in the buildings. There were only electronic hijackers on board, no Arabs.

If this was the case then the pilots should have been able to communicate their situation to flight control. This means that the people on the control towers are in the plot as well (or being silenced). Or should we assume that communication was disabled (during the flight) as well ?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:23 am 
Offline
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
User avatar

Joined: Jun 27th, 2005
Posts: 31563
Location: Japan
no the pilots could not communicate they were gassed. I am sure they could simply shut the communication off as well. But some of the short calls were of choking. I swear its like they want us to know. Its like JFK they cannot help themselves from bragging. Everything broke so much faster than before because of the web.

_________________
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter

"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us."
Batman
Image
Google version of War by Deception
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed




ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you



Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 7:00 am 
Offline
Speaking out
Speaking out
User avatar

Joined: Nov 10th, 2006
Posts: 145
Good point about the choking. One of the flight attendants, I think it was Betty Ong, said the hijackers were using mace or something similar because she said she had trouble breathing or some passengers had trouble.

I dont think it was mace. Mace is tear gas and makes one's eyes sting and water more than it causes breathing difficulties. It doesn't make one lose consciousness.

If it were really Mace, I think Ong would have reported that she couldn't see, her eyes would be watering too much and she would be in acute pain.

The 'gas' that was used was an anesthetic agent, something that would incapacitate a person quickly so that they would pass out and offer no resistance.

Has anyone looked at the timeline of that phone call? Because I am pretty sure after she reported that, all talking and activity ceased on the plane, except of course, for the hijackers, who would be wearing respirators.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 9:50 am 
Offline
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
User avatar

Joined: Jun 27th, 2005
Posts: 31563
Location: Japan
there is no video footage of any of the hijackers from any of the airports they supposedly were in the morning of 911. All the airports had their security managed by Israel through a Dutch front comany. This company got immunity from lawsuits concerning 911 which would force them to show their tapes. That was pass Jan 1, 2001 on Newyears.

Why? well that answer is obvious. esp if you have read my 911 blog.

_________________
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter

"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us."
Batman
Image
Google version of War by Deception
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed




ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you



Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next

Board index » Archives by areas of the world » Archived topics here » 9/11


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: