Anti-Neocons

You own reaction demonstrated the laziness given the availability of information instead of relying to knee-jerk reply.
You called killtown stupid yet you cannot analyze his/her message then verifying it with available references through the Internet.
With that kind of behaviour, how can you be taken seriously?

Scouring the intertoobs for all images relative to the term nasa1, which I now realize must be in reference to the head of the National Association of Stupid Assholes, is something for which I don't have the time or desire.

No. I didn't call killtown stupid. But, your using a stupid fucking animated gif by killtown rather than a video of much better quality (with attribution) of a test that occurred 17 years prior to 9/11 as if there were no advancement in technology during those 17 years is... stupid.

_________________
●▬▬▬▬▬▬★ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N★▬▬▬▬▬▬●
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀
It's not just for breakfast any more.

"Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental
opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a
distinguished period and pursued unalterably through every
change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic
plan of reducing [a people] to slavery."
~~ Thomas Jefferson

"Power kills, absolute power kills absolutely. The more power a government has, the more it can arbitrarily make war on others and murder foreign and domestic subjects. The more that government is constrained and diffused, the less tendency there is for them to commit genocide."
~~ Art Crino

When they put you in the internment camp, if you're really, really good, they might let you watch Dancing With The Stars.

Yet you have time to swear. You started that kind of reaction, expect both way. I do not know you, you do not know me. How hard is to ask for the source in polite manner instead of this above tone?


Doesn't it occur to you the poster may not have enough time to fully dig in then quickly research to give some clue? Stupid animated gif from your perspective and relevant yet nobody but you complained. If you have nothing to contribute to the discussion, then do not post. This test illustrated the difficulty to remotely handle a commercial jet because of many variables like turbulence. The time of footage is irrelevant to the topic. Advancement of technology does not matter, piloting a commercial jet like a B757 electronically or not still requires skills meaning the failure rate to perfectly hit a wall below 6 feet of altitude is extremely high.

After visiting this site, those who support that no plane hit the pentagon were right after all. The reasons:
- impossible physics like the speed of B757 travelling at 500 mph at sea level, no trace of disturbance
- the inconsistent fallen poles facing outward the Pentagon
- multiple edited images of the shots (those who are in image editing industry will immediately spot the flaws)
- only witnesses claiming to see the plane are part of mainstream medias i.e. paid actors, those trying to tell about the real events are deliberately silenced.
- version of the Hercules C130 pilots were altered
- the confiscation of hundred of cameras clearly showing no plane hitting the Pentagon only reinforce that points
- it becomes clear the media are accomplice for the entire 911 hoax using composite videos. Version of mainstream medias were altered with a combination of cgi. The fact no one from NYC near WTC hear a B767 coming mean no commercial jet flew on that area.
- based on those analysis, one can conclude no plane hit any building at those days. Instead, mainstream medias relies on TV fakery (clue, watch any NFL game live and notice the cgi yellow line). It is not the first time such fakery were done.

Here is a compilation of real plane crashes compared with the 911 fakery.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4KGVKUuTJQ&feature=related