there is no footage of barbara olsen boarding the plane either....from the passenger list i`d wager 77 was part of the drills going on that day..might help explain how they were able to provide a 100% dna match on all passengers from the pentagon site without a proven trace of the plane they were said to be on...even though 77 wasn`t listed to fly that day..
i think some aircraft hit the pentagon, but you still haven`t provided any proof that it was 77 beyond defending the official scenario telling us that it was...that scenario called for a plane to hit the pentagon and it seems likely one did, but it doesn`t automatically mean it was 77 because it fits with the provided cover story..
"You mean besides people seeing a fucking plane hit the building and the DNA matching the passengers other than the hijackers who were never found"
neither prove the plane was 77...
," and the plane size hole in the building and the PLANE PARTS in the building."
i`m not seeing this hole you are claiming to see in the ground floor and the engine and wheel are not identified as coming from 77...a smaller plane covers all your plane points..
"And the fact that no one saw a plane fly AWAY from the building and it sure as shit didn't land going that fast. Oh sure other than that....
i never mentioned a fly over or a landing..
"Lol why are you people so fucking retarded? You are believing in a missile When THERE IS NO EVIDENCE, NONE, ZERO for that and no motive. But rejecta plane, when there are parts of it in the building and all the people on it are dead."
tip; i`m not fucking retarded and the only one talking about missiles and fly overs is you...i think it was a smaller jet/military plane...aka...a plane hit the building...not a missile and not a fly over nor a landing or any other talking point..a plane, just not the one you are clinging on to..
"Do you REALLY think they staged the light poles being knocked over and then went and put charred plane parts in the building mad e a plane going 500 disappear, faked the DNA and faked the deaths, and all for what?"
no, i think the lightpoles and charred plane parts fit in with my scenario, i mentioned my take on the dna tests...if they are legit..
"so they could use a missile? and why!? there is no reason at all to do all that crap when they could just hit the building with the fucking plane. You people are RETARDED. "
you keep pretending everyone including me is talking about a missile...why?...
"I'm going on the offense now. You have failed to disprove the existence of superman thus he is real."
no ry, you just failed to convince me on this occassion despite your passion or the respect i have for your opinion..
"Never mind that there is no proof of him, I'm just going to say he is real, until you show me a tape of krypton blowing up and that nothing was sent from there...
nothing much strikes me as real about the official story of 9/11, that includes flight 77 buried in the pentagon...
"You prove it was a missile. Oh wait you can't you don't have a god damn thing to point to other than you didn't get to see a clear tape of a plane."
again, it is you claiming it is a missile or 77, not me..
"Under that same logic why not claim Aliens blew a hole in the wall and planted the plane parts and bribed eye witnesses and got all the families to pretend their loved ones were dead."
alien illumianti maybe?...with missiles....you might be on to something...lol....
"STUPID. You dont need a got damn video tape to show there was a plane that hit the building there is already physical evidence for it and I am sure if a tape was produced you people would just say it's fake and continue preaching the missile mythology."
there is physical evidence for a plane but no factual evidence for that plane being flight 77 "you people" keep preaching about....
" You'r like a religious cult. No amount or reason or science matters."
i`m open to reason but you don`t have the science on this issue, you have speculation and a missile fetish.
" One things gets proven wrong and you go to the next question that gets proven wrong and you have already forgotten the first question's answer and you move back to it. It's like talking to an animal which is blind by using sign language in the dark, after it has died.
you are giving your answers on this too much credit, you have an opinion on this i don`t agree with no matter how far in the gutter you want to get or how blindly you want to hurl the insults, i don`t believe the flight 77 story you are promoting.