 |
 |
Anti-NeoconsRys2sense |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
funk
|
Post subject: Re: For the No Brains no Plane hit the Pentagon kooks/parrots Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:20 pm |
|
 |
| Fights PNAC daily |
 |
Joined: Feb 26th, 2007 Posts: 611 Location: Canuckistan
|
Holy shit, I would never have noticed that 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dissent
|
Post subject: Re: For the No Brains no Plane hit the Pentagon kooks/parrots Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 8:29 pm |
|
 |
| Anti-Neocon Patrol |
 |
Joined: Jun 30th, 2005 Posts: 4199 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
hey that pic you posted, how come i dont see that specific frame in any of the pentagon videos? i looked in the 9/11 truth websites and that is posted is this one. It looks like a frame is missing there. 
_________________ "Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of ... [Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness], it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government." –Thomas Jefferson
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
freedomrox
|
Post subject: Re: For the No Brains no Plane hit the Pentagon kooks/parrots Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 3:24 am |
|
 |
| Anti-Neocon novice |
 |
Joined: Dec 21st, 2010 Posts: 16
|
|
OK, Ry, I am listening. Now, could you please explain this fire in the same context as the whole video? This sorry excuse for a release of the Pentagram crash has already been proven beyond any shadow of doubt that it has been altered and photo-shopped. For God's dake, just look at the unnatural shadows present in the forefront of the first shot compared to all the others. It was clearly altered, so the whole thing is suspect and irrelevant. You should not rely on such obviously faulty data.
See, in a court of law if any testimony is proven false then ALL of the testimony is thrown out. Fool me once. I have no idea if there is a fire there or anywhere on this clip, because the entirety has been nullified. Very poor and sloppy work on your part.
You accused me of going to wild way-out sites and drinking their kool-aid, but the truth is I do not know how to upload videos or pics on this site. I will go anywhere that posts the photos I need to prove the point that physics do not support a 757 HEAVY hitting it. One's that I had verified, were on sites that were taken down just as mine was. I agree these sites that do still show verified photos are way out there, but I do not have access to any of my own that were on my site. Those mysteriously "disappeared" from archive.org. Don't believe me, then click on my 9/11 photos link and see what comes up. So many images have been lost, and since i had no way in 2003 to back up or restore, then it was lost after numerous root kits were inserted into the old P166. My site was on the web for 3 years, but only one survived and more is disappearing almost daily.
Just to let you know, there was a lot more going on than any of you know, but without the video and pictoral evidence, then I am just another nutjob. Trust me when i say, or don't, MUCH more was happening at the Pentagram and WTC1 and 2 than any truly can grasp. Mossad was there, yes, but proof exists that British forces and CIA were heavily involved as well that day. It is not just Zionist's, and dual citizens, but also directly involved MI-6/ISI assisted demolitions units that were in NYC 3 months prior. It is a lot bigger than even you know.
I am disappointed though that you fell back to such discredited disinfo as the officially released Pentagon/Bin Laden/ Adam Gadahn tapes for evidence of anything. Tim Osman has been dead for a loooong time, but lives on out of focus videotapes and software produced voice inducers.
For Shame
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Q'
|
Post subject: Re: For the No Brains no Plane hit the Pentagon kooks/parrots Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 3:58 pm |
|
 |
| Protesting War |
 |
Joined: Oct 14th, 2006 Posts: 245
|
Ry wrote: Q I didn't even say what the angle was, so I could not have not taken it account. Rather than assuming the angle like the missile dumb asses, I worked scientifically instead, I see the hole and from that determine how it had to have entered and the 100 foot hole on the first floor is more than enough for the 757 plane wing span and all. It tilted slightly left. Having looking at the blueprint of 757 and 767, the latter is close to the impact. What other posters pointed out are the ground effect that will make the use of remote control difficult. I have suggested the possibility of disguised military drone, not missile. Given the fact there were military plane present to those scene hence Hercules C130, the limited speed of commercial jet (thanks to posters to highlight that information), the fact Bush administration immediately mention commercial jets prior of the crash to the Pentagon, transborder offline during 40 minutes, one can eliminate the use of commercial jet which leads to either missile or a disguised drone armed with missile. That probably explains the few number of wheels and jet engine. For those reason, I have to side with people like Pilot for 9/11. Another question, if Flight 77 really crashed into the Pentagon, why the FBI spent so much effort to remove recorded tapes from all cameras to only release a incomplete frame sequence? Otherwise, FBI will not even bother. It is better to take a break, clean mind and come back refreshed. Peace.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Ry
|
Post subject: Re: For the No Brains no Plane hit the Pentagon kooks/parrots Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:57 pm |
|
Joined: Jun 27th, 2005 Posts: 31538 Location: Japan
|
|
You guys are funny, looking at blue prints etc none of you know what the hell your talking about or can determine squat about it. There are pieces of a Boeing 757 in the building. The notion that the whole thing burned up is total bullshit as were the selected photos to conceal the large entry hole. There were plenty of lane parts found and they were of a 757 there is no mystery here.
_________________ This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else. My Twitter "It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman Google version of War by Deception (Magic Bunnies) Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed
ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dissent
|
Post subject: Re: For the No Brains no Plane hit the Pentagon kooks/parrots Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:16 pm |
|
 |
| Anti-Neocon Patrol |
 |
Joined: Jun 30th, 2005 Posts: 4199 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
_________________ "Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of ... [Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness], it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government." –Thomas Jefferson
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dissent
|
Post subject: Re: For the No Brains no Plane hit the Pentagon kooks/parrots Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:18 pm |
|
 |
| Anti-Neocon Patrol |
 |
Joined: Jun 30th, 2005 Posts: 4199 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
_________________ "Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of ... [Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness], it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government." –Thomas Jefferson
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Q'
|
Post subject: Re: For the No Brains no Plane hit the Pentagon kooks/parrots Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:56 pm |
|
 |
| Protesting War |
 |
Joined: Oct 14th, 2006 Posts: 245
|
Ry wrote: The notion that the whole thing burned up is total bullshit as were the selected photos to conceal the large entry hole. There were plenty of lane parts found and they were of a 757 there is no mystery here. For the rare time, I will not side on your argument on this one. Should it really be B757, why FBI and other agencies wasted their energy to confiscate all recorded tapes from station that displayed that impact to only release an incomplete frame sequence? The entire video of B757 impact would be displayed 24 hours back then. The fact there is no available video only looked suspicious meaning something else impact the renovated Pentagon side that happened to include crucial information. You have not answered those issues yet switched to missiles instead of suggested jet powered drone. Your conclusion is also in contradiction with: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.htmlhttp://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... a&aid=6133Key points from second link Quote: (1) The hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands 44 feet above the ground; the kind and quantity of debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: there were no wings, no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Not even the engines were recovered, and they are practically indestructible.
(2) Of an estimate 84 videotapes of the crash, the three that have been released by the Pentagon do not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as even Bill O'Reilly admitted when one was shown on "The Factor". At 155 feet, the plane was more than twice as long as the 77-foot Pentagon is high and should have been visible. There are indications of a much smaller plane, but not a Boeing 757.
(3) Indeed, the aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory--flying more than 500 mph barely above ground level--physically impossible, because of the accumulation of a massive pocket of compressed gas (air) beneath the fuselage; and if it had come it at an angle instead, it would have created a massive crater; but there is no crater and the official trajectory is impossible.
(4) Flying low enough to impact with the ground floor would have meant that the enormous engines were plowing the ground and creating massive furrows; but there are no massive furrows. The smooth, unblemished surface of the Pentagon lawn thus stands as a "smoking gun" proving the official trajectory cannot be sustained.
So how can one jump to the conclusion B757 hit the Pentagon based on those above reports? [Dissent] Any demonstration with a heavier plane like commercial jet instead of fighter jet? Look at the Pentagon plan, the thickness of that wall prior to impact. As for the displayed pictures, fragments are suspicious especially the fourth picture. Possibly those debris are planted. Not far then was a Hercules C130 that I mentioned yet not discussed further. Perhaps that C130 was there to plant these debris. Second picture on second row should show big hole yet the wall and window frames still stand. Engine from B757 is heavy, look at the composition and material. I don't claim to be an expert but based on reports from pilots and people who actually works on airport to maintain commercial jets, the entire B757 hitting Pentagon (initially announced by the Bush administration) is in doubt.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
 |