Ry wrote:
Don't you mean GMILF?
I would hit it with my fist in the face. She's a holy roller basketcase. sadly the guy is right though. Looks count a lot.
It's not GMILF... it's Cougar. But she is not one.
I know you all already saw this, but I am posting it here. Palin's fatwa.
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Palin_tel ... _0911.htmlHonestly. No matter how good looking a woman is, no matter how hot she is, somewhere, somebody is tired of her shit.
The sooner we realize looks don't count for anything, the better.
It's this mentality that restricts us from debating responsible tax policy. When we put sex appeal over good policy it's no better than putting Israel ahead of our interests. It's like having a war on drugs while doing next to nothing about the homeless. It's like being OK with our government being involved in middle eastern drug cartels but allowing bridges to collapse in the US. It's like handing over port security to Dubai and claiming we have to let the govt listen to our phone conversations in the name of security.
If we keep voting like this, we're going to have to increase our population growth amongst the poorer classes so we have enough workers to cover the bill on the other side.
Sorry, but this woman makes me want to vomit. She's not as nasty as a boil but she spews the puss of the religious establishment. I tell her "thanks, but no thanks."
If I had a bridge to nowhere, I'd smack her with it.