in response to the question "Why did the U.S. invade Iraq in 2003?" I wrote this essay.
Why Did the U.S. Invade Iraq?
"No blood for oil," screams the left. "But it's in our interest!" screams the right. Neither of these assessments get to the heart of the matter, and act as if history before 2003 doesn't exist. I don't have to go into the claims about WMD's or talk about the joke of democracy building here - nobody takes those claims seriously anymore. The closest anyone gets is the left asserting that "they" - vaguely meaning the Bush administration - wanted control over oil. The water gets even muddier with the assertion that control of oil is in "our" interest. But who is we?
The origins of the lies that led us into war with Iraq stem from Project for a New American Century (PNAC). The neoconservative group's idealogy was based on an Israeli policy paper entitled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm." This document called for regime change throughout the Middle East, in order to establish a "greater Israel." It was written by Douglass Feith, Richard Perle, and David Wurmser. PNAC carries Feith and Perle as crossovers or shared members with the "Clean Break" authors, forming the core ideological center of the hardcore zionist thinktank along with the likes of William Kristol (The Weekly Standard). Among PNAC's modern day Schlieffen Plans are "How to Attack Iraq," and "Bombing Iraq Isn't Enough." In "Rebuilding America's Defenses," PNAC authors innocently muse that all this regime change will be really difficult - short of a "new pearl harbor." Here's the list of the neoconservative zionists who signed PNAC's open letter to Bill Clinton, pressing for a war with Iraq: Elliott Abrams, Richard L. Armitage, William J. Bennett, Jeffery Bergner, John Bolton, Paula Dobriansky, Francis Fukuyama, Robert Kagan, Zalmay Khalilzad, William Kristol, Richard Perle, Peter W. Rodman, Donald Rumsfeld, William Schnieder Jr., Vin Weber, Paul Wolfowitz, R. James Woolsey, Robert B. Zoellick. In this letter, the authors claim that we have no ability to tell whether Iraq is making weapons of mass destruction. It clearly presses the president to go to war. Now, you may begin to realize that basically all of these people involved are Jewish. And that's not racist, that's just true. The only reason this matters, is that by the Law of Return they all have dual citizenship with Israel. Might that not give these men a conflict of interest? Might that not make these men invested in Israel's illegal occupation of Palestine? And also further expansion into the other lands surrounding Israel? After all, "A Clean Break" calls for a "Greater Israel." And after all, Douglass Feith owned an Israeli company called Feith and Zell that received government contracts from the Pentagon while he was working his government job in the Office of Special Plans.
With the election of George W. Bush, many of these zionists wind up in high ranking positions within the administration. John Bolton, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz are examples. Richard Perle and Douglass Feith wind up in the Office of Special Plans in the Department of Defense in the Pentagon. The Office of Special Plans is the office that lied the United States into war by creating false evidence based on the lies that were originally written by PNAC. This office created the Niger forgery which allowed the mainstream media to declare unanimously that Iraq was building a nuclear bomb.
As of 2007, Israel receives 40% of its oil from Iraq. Since 9/11 oil hasn't gotten any cheaper for Americans. The United States invaded Iraq because it was good for a few Zionist businessmen and their business partners in this great con - the Bush and Bin Laden families.
bulls on parade!