Ry wrote:
Wrong on the contrary it is entirely OBBJECTIVE.
How can it be objective, when what may have been regarded as "supernatural" at one point, is later shown to be completely natural? In such a case, "supernatural" would simply be a term that people use to describe what is unexplained to them.
Quote:
:lol: Wrong
It can't be acted on by something else, not unless you are inventing a thing that is not matter and yet is not nothing and yet can interact with matter too.
Two basic properties of all matter set itself in motion, heat and gravity. Other properties of matter which are very varifiable or the other forces. Ever heard of chemistry? It's not random. Its the nature of matter to move, it really can't be inert, and its its nature to go through every combination the lasting forms being self replicating like DNA etc etc. You really dont know squat about science do you?
Heat and gravity aren't really "matter" though, nor are any of those other forces. Matter has to have mass and volume for it to be matter, and things like "heat", "gravity" or those other forces do not.
Quote:
The assumption that all was just a bunch of rocks sitting still in space is as silly and dumb as your prior assumption that all was once nothing and had to be created. you're however many years old and never thought on your own matter was eternal until I said it. Thats because you already had the god idea placed into from a young age and thats explain all explination why is X oh because the magic things made it that way. Its not even an answer.
I never said I actually believed that matter was eternal. I only accepted the idea for argument's sake to make the point that it doesn't matter. I've already explained that I agree with the cosmological argument and why more than once.
