Anti-Neocons

so that doesn't prove anything, they are the closest thing to us, but they are still totally different

It doesn't matter if it's a long time for an animal to change to a new species drastic changes in DNA would have to happen. Like I said if that was possible than it's possible for a reptile to turn into a mammal, one in depth look at our bodies and that of animals and you can tell this is impossible. Even over millions of years...

Now i'm not saying animals don't have major changes over millions of years, i'm saying that these changes can easily be labeled adaptation. Changes to better help animals to survive such as larger tools to kill prey or to have an easier time surviving in a new kind of environement is all adaptation, not a change in species.

This is what they say the whale looked like during prehistoric times.


I don't know what exact kind of whale it is but what I do know is that they never laid eggs, were cold blooded, were always mammals, and always breathed oxygen. However, those teeth definately changed, and so did the shape of the head. Why? well those teeth probably changed because of a better way to eat and the shape of it's head obviously changed over generations because a streamlined body benefits swimming animals much more than that uneven look. That's adaptation, it doesn't change it's species.

If you can prove to me that an animal has had changes in way of reproduction or diets that would definately be something to think about.

I don't know much about the subject of evolution (still studying it) but from what I read the theory just seems iffy to me. If it was true many things today wouldn't be the same (at least that's what I think).

_________________

in my opinion, i definately don't flat out reject the theory of eveolution. I agree with sangre, i believe in a form of adaptation or even evolution WITHIN species, but i definately don't believe that we all came from fish. yes, obviously each species (i.e. fish, cats, etc.) has evolved within themselves, as well as humans...i mean humans haven't always looked like we do now. there's a big difference between the neanderthals and modern-day man. and yes, we share about 98% of our DNA with apes, but i'm still kinda skeptical that we came from apes...However, i would never go as far as completely denying ANY truth in Darwin's theory.

_________________
www.myspace.com/sarsurafiveseven

"Whoever kills another one without justifiable cause, surely he is killing all of humanity. And whoever saves the life of another one, surely he saves the lives of all of humanity." [The Holy Qur'an, Sura Al Ma'aidah: Ayah 32]

"Nothing can bring you peace but yourself"
- Ralph Waldo Emerson

I know i'm right because one really good example is today's dolphin or whale.

I can't find a picture of it but they say the dolphin was actually a dog-like mammal that lived on land and it "evolved" into the dolphin today because it started to live on water.

If the theory of evolution was true than today's dolphins would not be breathing oxygen, they would have gills like fish. They would not have blowholes or have to breathe oxygen every once in a while.

Adaptation can change many things, but some stay permanent. And if these permanent attributes were able to change then that would definately be something strange.

_________________

unfortunately, what you guys are doing in your "there's no way for an animal to change species" is called assumption. What evolutionary scientists are doing is examining evidence.

And you still didn't really answer me question. Do you not beleive that over millions of years an animal could evolve to the point that it could not reproduce with an animal identical to it's ancestor millions of years prior?
That is speciation.

May I remind you that evolution is still a theory? It has countless flaws in it, so assuming that it's true is also assumption.

And no I don't believe it's possible for an animal species to change over millions of years of generations because if that were true then certain boundaries of "evolved" species would've changed already.



We would not see that hole on top of the dolphin's head because "over millions of years" has passed and if evolution was true the dophin could've turned into a fish even though originally it was a dog-like creature. But it isn't. It is still a mammal which reproduces the same way and needs to breathe oxygen, it's body just adapted to it's new environment. I don't see how these kinds of new attributes that resulted from adaptation which don't change major parts of your inner genetic make-up of how your body works can make a species of animal not be able to reproduce with it's ancestor of a million years ago.

_________________

wow we got another one.

Do you know what the word Theory mean? it does not mean the same thing as just an idea.

A theory is a composition of facts and facts are the strongest and most undisputed things we have.

Gravity is a "theory" that doesn't make it uncertain. It just means that Gravity combines many other established physical laws into a whole.

Evolution combines other established and tesable facts we know about Biology. DNA is not a guess it is a fact.

We can watch diseases and insects evolve and get immune to cures and poisons quickly because of their rapid generations.

The Theory of Evolution does not claim that people just came from apes like a lot of retarded biblical and I guess Qurranic dumb asses like to paint it because they heard it in Sunday school or from a cleric.

Apes are simply in the same Family (wich is a scientific term) as humans give that they have 98% of the same DNA. 2% is a big difference, but it not a big difference compared to 50% compatibility of say a human and a Banana. That is a massive difference. The catagoeires of animals and plants etc is not arbitary. Its backed up by observable gene sequences.



That is so fucking stupid. Evolution does not state that things just turn into other things like dolphin giving birth toa dog. You dont know what the Hell you are talking about and you can't argue against elevolution until you know what it is. And guess what genius there are other mammals that live in the Sea and do you know what all the fish breathe? No they dont breathe water they breathe Oxygen same as dolphins. Humans too breathe Oygen. ウェレアてぇオy減印てぇ愛rてぇさめ亜sふぃshBレア手オy減印てぇ和手ｒセえうぁてゃっぺねsと酔うrふぃし名短kウィthのPランtsオrしっるぁちおのふぉxy減。We breathe the Oygen in the air and fish breathe the oygen in the water. See what happens to your fish in a fish tank that has no plants and doesn't circulate oygen.

_________________
This site is against war, Zionism, (or any other form of racism), profiteering, and all forms of government corruption, mass media deception, and cover ups. This is not a site to flail on about space aliens-illuminati-masonic-deathcult-jewish-catholic-lizard-lucifarian-jesuit-queen-barvarian-etc bull hockey. Take that junk somewhere else.
My Twitter
"It doesn't matter who we are underneath. It is what we do that defines us." Batman

Google version of War by Deception
Pass HR 1207 and S604 audit the Fed



ry ryan dawson author politics political antineocon anti-neocon antineocons anti-neocons raising the volume of peace - news the media is paid not to tell you how they blep you

In science, a theory is a proposed description, explanation, or model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise falsified through empirical observation. It can still be proven wrong.



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah we can give inoculation to someone and the same thing happens and generations don't even have to pass by. This doesn't prove evolution, it's just natural adaptation. The Native Central Americans had a resistance to Malaria which the Europeans didn't have, did that make them more evolved? Hell no, they could'nt resist small pox because thier bodies were used to malaria not small pox and the Europeans were the other way around. But this happened to each of them because of ADAPTATION.


?

And I meant oxygen in the air. If evolution was true then over this long period of time dolphins should've formed gills. But they don't have them.

I don't even know why I am typing this up. Just read British_freedom_fighter's post and no evolution believer can refute that without looking like an idiot.



Actually I heard it from a proffesor in a nearby college and many Scientists think this way also.



It would not be in the famous picture if they didn't think this way. I am well aware that this isn't the popular idea of it, but it is one and regardlesss it's just so funny it had to be made fun of.

_________________