 |
 |
Anti-NeoconsRys2sense |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Fat Pat
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:16 am |
|
Joined: Jun 29th, 2005 Posts: 551 Location: Genoa City (Vile Valley), WI
|
Socrates wrote: I heard a saying one time that Libertarians are the kinds of people that would throw you a book on how to swim if you were drowning.  They want to help, but they just aren't very effective.
Ha ha. That could be. Funny saying if anything.
Daily Show was pretty funny a few weeks ago when they were showing the Libertarian Party in Harlem distributing "Guns for Tots". It was based on principle because the government was trying to legislate that kids couldn't have toy guns or whatever, heh, heh.. but as Daily Show pointed out sarcasticlly.. is it really practicle? And I mean, will it solve starvation, and climate change (which many Libertarians seem to disbelieve), or terrorism etc.? So yeah, I can see that little saying having some legitimacy.
_________________ Render unto Cesar that which he has rendered unto you - hardship, imprisonment, torture, and eventual death. Fuck Cesar. Let him be hanged.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Ry
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:59 am |
|
Joined: Jun 27th, 2005 Posts: 31563 Location: Japan
|
|
Libertarians are better than that. They pretty much run antiwar.com a great sight.
The media yes even comedy central an arm of the left, picks on the most extreme kinds of libertarians. It's like using Rush to represent all republicans or joe liberman for all democrats. Or the harry potter book burners for all christians.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fat Pat
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:12 pm |
|
Joined: Jun 29th, 2005 Posts: 551 Location: Genoa City (Vile Valley), WI
|
|
OH I'm definitely not saying that's all of them, don't get me wrong. I understand they come in as many different stripes as any other political philosophy. I'm just saying The Daily Show has a good point on the tendency of over zealous Libertarians who put far too much emphasis on principle.
But yeah, Daily Show when they are trying to make a serious political point are quite Liberal. Just straight up, too. Like totally typical Democrat (not too moderate, not too leftist). But that's okay. As far as journalism goes and them holding people accountable for things they do, they are better than pretty much the rest of cable. I watch it religiously and not really because I want to get the day's news either. It's not about the news. It's about the mockery, the ridicule, and witty points they make concerning power. Sure, they're there for laughs, but even the court jesters have truth behind their jokes about the king, ya know? I'd rather listen to the jestures than the trumpets of war.
_________________ Render unto Cesar that which he has rendered unto you - hardship, imprisonment, torture, and eventual death. Fuck Cesar. Let him be hanged.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
brimofinsanity
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:00 am |
|
Joined: Jul 5th, 2005 Posts: 77 Location: SF, CA
|
hate edge wrote: How about these Libertarians: www.nazi.org? 
i was browsing through the website in the part about "Why Race?".... i just want to know how anybody can take those people seriously when they use the word "chink" in their platform... HA
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Iconoclast
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:47 pm |
|
Joined: Jun 29th, 2005 Posts: 1171
|
brimofinsanity wrote: hate edge wrote: How about these Libertarians: www.nazi.org?  i was browsing through the website in the part about "Why Race?".... i just want to know how anybody can take those people seriously when they use the word "chink" in their platform... HA
"The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48"
Chink Chink (chi^ngk), n. OE. chine, AS. cimacne
fissure, chink, fr. cimacnan to gape; akin to Goth. Keinan
to sprout, G. keimen. Cf. Chit.
A small cleft, rent, or fissure, of greater length than
breadth; a gap or crack; as, the chinks of a wall.
1913 Webster
_________________ "When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him." ~ Jonathan Swift
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
brimofinsanity
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:03 pm |
|
Joined: Jul 5th, 2005 Posts: 77 Location: SF, CA
|
|
apparently i was pretty tired when i read it and misunderstood. duhhhhhh
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Nomad
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:11 pm |
|
Joined: Sep 9th, 2005 Posts: 96 Location: Manhattan
|
I'm definitely not a Libertarian. I think unregulated capitalism is a disaster and I honestly think the Libertarians in general are going to be a problem in the future. If the American general public ever realizes the current two-party hegemony is a bad thing and starts looking for new ideas the Greens and Libertarians will be first to bat. As somebody who prefers the Greens, I think we should watch out for the Libertarians now.
http://world.std.com/~mhuben/libindex.html
"That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves" --Kim Stanley Robinson
_________________ planet over property community over competition well-being over wealth cooperation over control

|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fat Pat
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:23 pm |
|
Joined: Jun 29th, 2005 Posts: 551 Location: Genoa City (Vile Valley), WI
|
|
I think unregulated capitalism is a disaster
What an interesting statement. I wonder if I'll ever get the chance to see it. Did you see it in a movie or something? Read it in a book?
_________________ Render unto Cesar that which he has rendered unto you - hardship, imprisonment, torture, and eventual death. Fuck Cesar. Let him be hanged.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
 |