Anti-Neocons

But we do know what happened on flight 93. we uncovered the black box . . .

UNITED 93 DATA PROVIDED BY US GOVERNMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT OBSERVED EVENTS

The data provided by the NTSB contradict observed events in several significant ways:


1. The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not support observations.

2. All Altitude data on the northern approach contradicts witnesses published by the New York Times.

3. Witness observations of approach path contradict northern approach as described by Popular Mechanics and the US Govt. Several witnesses observed the aircraft approaching from southeast over Indian Lake and from the south prior to witnessing explosion. Parts found in New Baltimore, 8 miles southeast of crater is a direct contradiction to the northern approach claimed by the US Govt.

4. Environmental Protection Agency reports no soil contamination of jet fuel after testing 5,000-6,000 yards of earth including 3 ground wells. Smoke plume photographed by a witness does not suggest a jet fuel rich explosion.

5. Impact angle according to Flight Data Recorder does not support an almost vertical impact as the govt story and crater suggests.

In May, 2007, members of Pilots for 9/11 Truth received these documents from the NTSB and began a close analysis of the data they contain. After expert review and cross check, Pilots for 9/11 Truth has concluded that the information in these NTSB documents does not support, and in some instances factually contradicts, the official government position that United Airlines Flight 93 created the impact crater as reported, in Somerset County, PA on the morning of September 11, 2001. . .

. . . However, many witnesses contradict altitude as well as approach path. Also according to reports, and as the impact crater suggests, United Airlines Flight 93 impacted terrain at an almost vertical 90 degree angle, while the Flight Data Recorder shows a 35 degree angle with up-sloping terrain, further reducing impact angle.

(source)
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/UA93_Press_Release.html

we uncovered . . . the flight recording and have dozen of airphone and cell phone calls . . .

. . .They took the plane down end of story. Unless you think all that stuff is fake

Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners

Response to Questions Evoked by My Fifth Estate Interview

Conclusion

Although this essay has focused on details, often minute, in merely one aspect of the official account of 9/11, the implications are enormous. . . .

. . . Although the contents of Taylor’s briefing have never been made public, the main evidence provided to the general public has consisted of the hijack-describing phone calls reportedly received from passengers and flight attendants aboard the airliners. But when subjected to a detailed analysis, these alleged phone calls, far from supporting the war-justifying story, lead to a very different conclusion: that these alleged calls were faked. This analysis thereby suggests that the entire 9/11 story used to justify the US-led wars is a lie. . . .

. . . Nevertheless, the importance of the evidence against the official account provided by analyzing the alleged phone calls should not be minimized. If the official story is false, then we should expect every major dimension of it to be false – which, as I have emphasized in another recent book, can be seen to be the case. It is this cumulative argument that provides the strongest disproof of the official, war-justifying account of 9/11. The evidence that the alleged phone calls from the airliners were faked is an important part of this cumulative argument.

(source)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/phone-call ... airliners/

Flight 93 'was shot down' claims book

by ROWLAND MORGAN

Twelve eyewitnesses state seeing another jet nearby.

They claim they saw an F-16 move closer in and fire what were probably two Sidewinder missiles, one of them catching at least one of the Boeing?s huge engines, after which the ?plane dropped like a stone?.

Someone else ?heard a loud bang? and saw the airliner plummet. A Vietnam War veteran said he ?heard a missile?, a sound he knew well. It is debatable how seriously we should take these reports. But there are numerous and highly credible witness accounts of a mysterious white jet being seen after Flight 93 went down.

(source)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -book.html

you're dense

how about this, passengers (heroes) took down the plane. The calls of real people were real the black box backs this up. The plane did not reach its target and so the government had to blow building 7 and look like idiots. And loose change and alex jones are just full of shit as they are on every aspect of 911.

Actually Rivero agrees with me on 93.

(at mark 8:50 in the below video)

"What I think happened,

. . . is that Flight 93 was supposed to be the airplane that was going to crash into building seven to justify its collapse on the script.

The flight crew of Flight 93 regained control of their airplane.

They could not be allowed to land because the facts on the airplane didn't match
the cover story.

No Arab terrorists. Possibly even remote control equipment that would have absolutely
brought this whole thing down.

So Flight 93 was shot down.

The wreckage was scattered over eight miles of country side.

And then, of course, they make a movie about them to say, 'Yes! They were heroic. They deliberately crashed the plane to save lives . .. '

. . . and various other assorted USDA choice bovine excrement that Hollywood's stock and trade is putting out to support the Government.

Kathryn Bigelow is making a lot of money doing that right now."

(source)
"The 9/11 Hoax and the New American Century 11 Years Later - Mike Rivero"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6XGtx8lXgk