Works with the Pentagon, and Flight 93.
Occam's Razor - "It is a principle urging one to select from among competing hypotheses that which makes the fewest assumptions. . .. The principle is often incorrectly summarized as 'other things being equal, a simpler explanation is better than a more complex one.'"
Can one make the argument that the "Passengers (Heroes) Crashed United 93" hypothesis is actually the more "convoluted" and "overly complex" explanation?
The "Official 9-11 Narrative" states that 19 "Radical Muslim" hijackers boarded four US Domestic flights and seized control of those four aircraft with the intent to crash them into predetermined targets.
One hit WTC-1, one hit WTC-2, one hit The Pentagon, and one crashed in Pennsylvania.
Yet, we know that explosives were strategically placed in WTC-1, WTC-2, and WTC-7.
Now, put all you "know" about 9-11 aside for a second . . . open your mind . . .
. . and ask the really big question:
"Why would anyone go through all those YEARS of planning, spend all that money, and take such an extreme risk . . .
. . . only to leave the key component of taking control of the 4 aircraft . . .
. . . up to a third party's competence and ability to succeed in 4 independent hijacking attempts?"
If I were going to carry out this "9-11" operation . . .
. . . . and I knew I had years to plan, all the resources of Israel, loyal World Zionist organizations, a Mossad coordinated Sayanim 5th Column network, a nearly unlimited budget, as well as a compromised U.S. Executive Branch and rogue U.S. Military and Law Enforcement factions at my disposal . . .
. . . I think I would prefer to have control of ALL aspects of the entire operation.
First, I would have to gain access and acquire control of the target sites.
(Lucky Larry Silverstein, Office of Special Plans at Pentagon, Kroll Associates)
Ideally, I would want to use my own specially modified planes and fly them like drones with computer guidance systems placed at the target sites to guide them in.
(ATASCO, Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI), SPC International, PTech, Mitre, Raytheon)
Of course, I would have to set up some kind "Drill Exercise" to act as a "diversion" to swap the planes.
(NORAD Drills "Vigilant Guardian" and "Vigilant Warrior")
Then I would have my loyal preselected flight crews land the real planes and dispose of the real passengers somewhere "discreet". If I am ruthless enough to kill thousands to start a war to kill millions, why would I care about killing dozens?
My only risk here would be if some hot shot pilot disregarded the new "Rules of Engagement" orders and made a field decision to shoot down one of my planes. . . and then it would be revealed that MY plane . .. wasn't THE plane it was supposed to be. .
So, I would need to set explosives in the planes to allow for remote detonation . . . to destroy the evidence and make positive identification of the aircraft very difficult . .
. . . as well as making sure I had my people conducting all investigations and using patriotic jingoism, fear and intimidation to silence any that got in the way of my operation.
Meanwhile, my 5th Column media agencies would be working closely with my Psy-Op teams to manage "damage control" and modify the official script to whatever problems or leaks may arise during the operation.
That's how I would have done it . . .
I wonder what the Israelis did? . . .